UN Agenda 2030: A Recipe for Global  Socialism - Written by Alex Newman -
http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/22267-un-agenda-2030-a-recipe-for-global-socialism 
The  United Nations and its mostly autocratic member regimes have big plans for your  life, your children, your country, and your world. And those plans are not  limited to the coercive "climate" agreement recently concluded in  Paris.
While  the establishment media in the United States was hyping ISIS, football, and of  course "global warming," virtually every national government/dictatorship on the  planet met at the 70th annual General Assembly at UN headquarters in New York to  adopt a draconian 15-year master plan for the planet. Top globalists such as  former NATO chief Javier Solana, a socialist, are celebrating the plan, which  the summit unanimously "approved," as the next "Great Leap Forward" - yes, the  old campaign slogan of the Chinese Communist Party.
The  master plan is comprised of 17 "Post-2015 Sustainable Development Goals" (SDGs)  with 169 specific "targets" to be foisted on all of humanity - literally all of  it, as the plan itself states explicitly. "As we embark on this collective  journey, we pledge that no one will be left behind," reads the UN manifesto,  entitled Transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.  But if you love liberty, self-government, free markets, or the U.S.  Constitution, you will almost certainly be wishing that the UN would leave you  behind.
Officially  dubbed "Agenda 2030," the UN plot, as its full title suggests, is aimed at  "transforming" the world. The program is a follow-up to the last 15-year UN  plan, the defunct "Millennium Development Goals," or MDGs. It also dovetails  nicely with the deeply controversial UN Agenda 21, even including much of the  same rhetoric and agenda. But the combined Agenda 2030 goals for achieving what  is euphemistically called "sustainable development" represent previous UN plans  on steroids - deeper, more radical, more draconian, and more  expensive.
"This  Agenda is a plan of action for people, planet and prosperity," reads the  preamble. "All countries and all stakeholders, acting in collaborative  partnership, will implement this plan." Ironically, the preamble even claims the  UN goals will "free the human race from the tyranny of poverty" and "heal" the  planet - or, as the planet is also referred to in the document, "Mother Earth."  Not-so-subtly purporting to usurp the role of God, the UN even claimed that the  "future of humanity and of our planet lies in our hands."
Speaking  on September 25 at the opening ceremony of the confab that adopted Agenda 2030,  Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon hinted at just how far-reaching the plot really  is. "The new agenda is a promise by leaders to all people everywhere," he  explained, presumably conflating "leaders" with mass-murdering gangsters such as  Kim Jong-un, Raul Castro, Robert Mugabe, and other despots who hold great sway  with most of the regimes comprising the United Nations. "It is a universal,  integrated and transformative vision for a better world." "We need action from  everyone, everywhere," Ban said, pointing to the "guide" offered by the 17 SDGs.  "They are a to-do list for people and planet, and a blueprint for success." "We  must use the goals to transform the world," Ban continued. "Institutions will  have to become fit for a grand new purpose."
The  Agenda 2030 agreement makes the audacity of the scheme clear, too. "This is an  Agenda of unprecedented scope and significance," boasts the document.   "Never before have world leaders pledged common action and endeavor across such  a broad and universal policy agenda," the agreement continues. "What we are  announcing today - an Agenda for global action for the next fifteen years - is a  charter for people and planet in the twenty-first century."
The  Agenda
Perhaps  the single most striking feature of Agenda 2030 is the practically undisguised  roadmap to global socialism and corporatism/fascism, as countless analysts have  pointed out. To begin with, consider the agenda's Goal 10, which calls on the  UN, national governments, and every person on Earth to "reduce inequality within  and among countries." To do that, the agreement continues, will "only be  possible if wealth is shared and income inequality is addressed."
As  the UN document also makes clear, national socialism to "combat inequality"  domestically is not enough - international socialism is needed to battle  inequality even "among" countries. "By 2030, ensure that all men and women, in  particular the poor and the vulnerable, have equal rights to economic  resources," the document demands. In simpler terms, Western taxpayers should  prepare to be fleeced so that their wealth can be redistributed internationally  as their own economies are cut down to size by Big Government. Of course, as has  been the case for generations, most of the wealth extracted from the productive  sector will be redistributed to the UN and Third World regimes - not the victims  of those regimes, impoverished largely through domestic socialist/totalitarian  policies imposed by the same corrupt regimes to be propped up with more Western  aid under Agenda 2030.
Wealth  redistribution alone, however, will not be enough. Governments must also seize  control of the means of production - either directly or through fascist-style  mandates. "We commit to making fundamental changes in the way that our societies  produce and consume goods and services," the document states. It also says that  "governments, international organizations, the business sector and other  non-state actors and individuals must contribute to changing unsustainable  consumption and production patterns ... to move towards more sustainable  patterns of consumption and production."
In  plain English, the Agenda 2030 document is claiming that today's "consumption  and production" patterns are unsustainable, so we'll need to get by with less.  How much less? It would be hard to find a more clear and concise assessment than  that offered by the late Maurice Strong, the recently deceased Canadian  billionaire  and longtime UN environmental guru who led the 1992 Earth  Summit, in a pre-Earth Summit document: "It is clear that current lifestyles and  consumption patterns of the affluent middle-class ... involving high meat  intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and 'convenience' foods,  ownership of motor vehicles, numerous electrical appliances, home and workplace  air-conditioning ... expensive suburban housing ... are not  sustainable."
In  truth, such "lifestyles and consumption patterns" are sustainable, so long as  the freedom that makes prosperity possible is not destroyed in the name of  achieving "sustainability." The UN and the environmental lobby claim that we  must get by with less because there are now too many people on the planet  consuming too many resources. But this rationale for accepting UN-imposed  scarcity is patently false.
Of  course, the promoters of Agenda 2030 would claim that rather than impoverish us,  the global regime they envision would take good care of us - through universal  health coverage, for instance. One of the targets for Goal 3, ensuring "healthy  lives" and "well-being," is: "Achieve universal health coverage," including  "vaccines for all." Universal access to "mental health," along with "sexual and  reproductive health-care services" - code words for abortion and contraception -  are also included. All governments are expected to integrate such services into  their "national strategies and programmes," the agreement demands.
It  is worth noting that mass-murdering Soviet dictator Vladimir Lenin made clear  that controlled healthcare is the "keystone" of socialism. The United Nations  obviously agrees. And though he may not call it "socialism," Obama undoubtedly  also views government control of healthcare as key. Indeed, enactment of  ObamaCare could be viewed as a "great leap forward" by the United States toward  implementation of a key component of Agenda 2030, before Agenda 2030 was even  "approved."
But  as important as targeting healthcare is to the globalist schemers, any plan for  building international socialism would be lacking without also targeting the  next generation with global-socialist propaganda. And so an entire goal of  Agenda 2030 is devoted to ensuring that all children, everywhere, are  transformed into what the UN calls "agents of change," ready to push forward the  plan for the new global order. "Children and young women and men are critical  agents of change and will find in the new Goals a platform to channel their  infinite capacities for activism into the creation of a better world," the  agreement explains.
The  sort of activists that the UN hopes to make your children into is also  explicitly defined in the agreement. "By 2030, ensure that all learners acquire  the knowledge and skills needed to promote sustainable development, including,  among others, through education for sustainable development and sustainable  lifestyles, human rights, gender equality, promotion of a culture of peace and  non-violence, global citizenship and appreciation of cultural diversity and of  culture's contribution to sustainable development," the global plan for 2030  states. Considering what the UN means by "sustainable development" - population  control, central planning, global governance, and more - the agenda for your  children takes on an even more sinister tone.
"Sustainable"  children for global citizenship in the new order will be accomplished via what  the UN misleadingly refers to as "education." In the UN document the word  "education" alone is mentioned more than 20 times. And throughout the agreement,  the UN openly advocates the use of schools to indoctrinate all of humanity into  a new set of values, attitudes, and beliefs in preparation for the new "green"  and "sustainable" world order. The UN's education agenda also puts sex  "education" front and center. "By 2030, ensure universal access to sexual and  reproductive health-care services [abortion and contraception], including for  family planning, information and education," the document explains.
How  much will Agenda 2030 cost? Various figures have been thrown around by UN  bureaucrats regarding the monetary costs of the plan, generally ranging between  $3 trillion and $5 trillion per year.
Yes,  trillions. In the "From Billions to Trillions" report released by the World Bank  in July 2015, the globalist outfit, a key player in Agenda 2030, conceded: "To  meet the investment needs of the Sustainable Development Goals, the global  community needs to move the discussion from 'Billions' in ODA [Official  Development Assistance] to 'Trillions' in investments of all kinds: public and  private, national and global, in both capital and capacity."
But  the money needed to implement Agenda 2030 and other UN schemes is only part of  the cost. Other parts include the loss of our national independence and freedom  that the rise of global governance and global socialism would surely entail.  Revealingly, empowering dictators to help in global governance is openly touted  by Agenda 2030. The document states, "We recommit to broadening and  strengthening the voice and participation of developing countries [the regimes  ruling those countries] - including African countries, least developed  countries, land-locked developing countries, small-island developing States and  middle-income countries - in international economic decision-making,  norm-setting and global economic governance."
Powerful  Promoters
When  Agenda 2030 was adopted at the 70th annual UN General Assembly confab in New  York City on September 25, the UN plot to re-engineer civilization was ushered  in with a "thunderous standing ovation," the UN Department of Public Information  reported. Every one of the 193 UN member governments on the planet - from  murderous communist and Islamist dictatorships to those ruling what remains of  the "Free World" - vowed to help impose the UN's controversial goals on their  subjects.
It  all sounded so wonderful to some of the world's most brutal dictators that they  could hardly contain their glee. "This agenda promises a brave new world, a new  world which we have to consciously construct, a new world that calls for the  creation of a new global citizen," gushed Marxist dictator Robert Mugabe, the  genocidal mass-murderer enslaving Zimbabwe who also serves as chairman of the  African Union. "I want to believe that we are up to this task that we have  voluntarily and collectively committed ourselves to. Our success, and in  particular the promise of a new world that awaits us, depends upon this  commitment." He also promised to vigorously impose the UN Agenda 2030 on the  starving and impoverished victims his regime lords over with Agenda 2030-style  policies. The communist Castro regime vowed to work with socialist Venezuelan  strongman Nicolas Maduro and other tyrants to impose the UN goals on their  victims, too - all with financing from Western taxpayers.    
The  brutal tyrants ruling Communist China, meanwhile, have also been enthusiastic  cheerleaders for the UN goals - goals that the regime boasted it played a  "crucial role" in developing. The Chinese autocracy, infamous for forced  abortions, censorship, religious and political persecution, the "one-child  policy," terrible pollution, kangaroo courts, and of course, murdering more  human beings than any other entity in all of human history, used its vast,  global propaganda machine to celebrate Agenda 2030.
"China  has made important contributions to the global efforts in reaching a fair,  inclusive and sustainable post-2015 development agenda," the regime's deputy  permanent representative to the UN, Wang Min, was quoted as saying in a report  by the Communist Chinese news and espionage service Xinhua. "China is also very  active in putting forward Chinese proposals.... The agreement includes important  proposals by China and many other developing countries in numerous  aspects."  
 Among  other "commitments," China promised to spend $2 billion in foreign countries to  meet the UN goals in "education" and "health," with its funding increasing to  $12 billion by 2030. While only contributing a small piece of the pie, the fact  that Beijing is so excited about the agenda is quite revealing. Echoing Chairman  Mao's rhetoric, EU and NATO globalist Javier Solana said, "With a sustained  commitment from all countries, developed and developing alike, the world can  ensure that it celebrates another great leap forward in 2030." (Emphasis added.)  The last "Great Leap Forward," presided over by Chairman Mao Tse-tung between  1958 and 1963, resulted in the murder of an estimated 45 million Chinese who  were worked, starved, or beaten to death.
The  Obama administration, which apparently does not plan to present the UN scheme to  the U.S. Senate for ratification as required by the U.S. Constitution, also  offered a forceful defense of the UN agenda. Speaking to the UN General Assembly  on September 27, 2015, after purporting to commit the United States to the  global plot, Obama claimed the UN blueprint "is one of the smartest investments  we can make in our own future."
Even  the world's leading religious figure, Pope Francis, addressed UN member  governments with a plea to support the UN goals. "The adoption of the 2030  Agenda for Sustainable Development ... is an important sign of hope," he  declared, before demanding a UN "climate" regime as well.
Beyond  governments and religious figures, much of the private sector also  enthusiastically backed the new goals. Among the mega-corporations backing the  scheme are the world's top three search engines: Google, Microsoft's Bing, and  Yahoo. It was not immediately clear whether those corporations' support for the  UN agenda would affect the supposed impartiality of search results, but critics  of the UN plan expressed alarm nonetheless.
For  now, at least, the world and the White House are all pretending that the SDGs  are binding on Americans, too. However, the U.S. Senate was not consulted, as  the Constitution requires for all treaties. And even if the Senate were to  ratify it, the federal government cannot grant itself new anti-constitutional  powers merely by approving a treaty. Therefore, the agreement has no force in  the United States. But as UN Agenda 21 showed clearly, that does not mean that  the Obama administration, and possibly future presidents, would not attempt to  push it forward anyway. The American people, therefore, must demand through  their elected representatives that the UN power grab be  stopped. 
BE SURE TO CHECK OUT MY ALL NEW PROPHECY AND CREATION DESIGN WEBSITES.  THERE IS A LOT TO SEE AND DO..........
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.