A Big Problem Is Brewing Behind "The Scenes:" Pentagon Admits To Prepping For Mass Civil Unrest
It's unfortunate that the majority of people in the United States refuse to accept anything that's not spoon-fed to them by the mainstream media or admitted "trustful" by politicians and business elitists. But the sign-posts of collapse are planted everywhere for anyone willing to put forth the effort to read them. I have not fully decided if the mass-engendered impulse to ignore reality is a product of sheer stupidity, slothful ignorance or willful denial.
Most people have chosen either to overlook the Jade Helm 15 exercises which "officially" begin next month and run through mid-September. Of course, there are been thousands of reports of ongoing military exercises and mass military equipment movement via rail from many States, including here in Colorado. The mainstream media is fueling the public's determined ignorance about Jade Helm by not reporting the event, for the most part.
However, now it has been reported that Department of Defense officials are now admitting that the Pentagon has been preparing for mass civil unrest:
A new US Department of Defense (DoD) research program admits that the Pentagon has long been concerned about widespread social break down. Even more striking of an admission is the fact that they have been funding universities to create models of the dynamics, risks and tipping points that would all be part of large-scale civil unrest in the United States.
You can read the details here: Pentagon Admits They Are Preparing For Mass Civil Breakdown
The article references source material, so it would be impossible to impose skepticism on the evidence. Anyone denying this reality is therefore hopelessly stupid or tragically naive.
I will have more on this later, but many have noticed some isolated events which indicate the global bond markets may be experiencing pre-collapse tremors. A bond market selling avalanche is the worst nightmare of the Central Banks.
Many analysts have been pointing to September as the time period when the real brown stuff begins to hit the fan. There are several possible trigger events, including the possible de-linking of the yuan from the dollar by China. Perhaps it is no coincidence the official Jade Helm exercises have been timed to end on September 15.
Obama Mulling Transfer of Weapons to Saudi Arabia Only Previously Given to Israel - By Ahuva Balofsky -
http://www.breakingisraelnews.com/39185/israels-military-superiority-take-obama-mulls-selling-advanced-weaponry-saudi-arabia-middle-east/#wGOOSv8Or7jvAFuX.97 "Give us help against the adversary; for vain is the help of man." (Psalms 108:13)
In an effort to allay the concerns of Gulf States regarding American commitment to their security, US President Barack Obama may be preparing to sell key ally Saudi Arabia weapons that had been previously made available only to Israel, reported The Washington Times reported last week.
According to claims made by the report, the Obama administration is weighing whether to offer Riyadh GBU-28 bunker-buster bombs to mitigate concerns over the looming nuclear deal with Iran.
The White House is expected to renew its efforts to establish a region-wide defense system among the Gulf States against Iranian missiles. Accompanying the offer of assistance will likely be additional security commitments; arms sales, especially to replenish Saudi supplies following the assaults it led in Yemen and participated in against Islamic State militants in Syria; and further joint military exercises. The bunker-busters may be part of the deal.
In a 2008 congressional mandate, the US made a commitment to ensuring Israel's regional military superiority. To provide Saudi Arabia with the bunker busters without violating that mandate, the US may offer Israel the newer and stronger GBU-57 bunker-buster bomb. However, the US has been reluctant to share that technology with anyone to date, including Israel.
"We have to make sure any transfer of weapons to anyone in the region won't undermine Israel's ability to defend itself," one official said in the Washington Times report.
Other military equipment sales under consideration include Kuwait's proposed purchase of 28 Boeing Co. F/A-18E/F Super Hornet advanced fighter jets, the outcome of which a US official said is unclear. Another official stated Washington is unlikely to offer Lockheed's new top-flight F-35 fighter jet to the Gulf States, though it has been promised to Israel and is expected to be delivered next year.
Obama is set to host the six-nation Gulf Cooperation Council - Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates - at the White House and then at Camp David later this week. The US president must walk a fine line between placating his allies' concerns over the Iranian nuclear deal solidifying in the coming weeks and being drawn into Middle East conflicts by making too many security commitments.
Iran's Gulf Arab neighbors have expressed fears that the deal which lifts sanctions against Iran in exchange for reduced nuclear expansion will not deter the Islamic Republic from developing a nuclear bomb or extending its influence in Syria, Yemen or Lebanon with its newly-released funds.
"It's a time to see what things might be required to be formalized," a senior US official said.
Not willing to risk increased tensions with Israel, nor to require the approval of the Republican-controlled Senate, Obama is unlikely to seek a full security treaty with the Gulf States. However, a new high-level joint working group led by the Pentagon, one high-level source suggested, may be established to help the GCC overcome internal rivalries and begin cooperating on and coordinating its missile defense.
"Missile defense is absolutely critical to the GCC right now," said Riki Ellison, founder of the nonprofit Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance. "They're not as efficient playing separately as they would be all playing as one team."
The Gulf States want concrete offers, however, not vague promises. "This summit can't just be a big photo opportunity to pretend everybody's on the same page on Iran," one Arab diplomat said.
Saudi king, followed by GCC rulers, snubs Obama on summit - US fails to isolate Netanyahu on nuclear deal - http://www.debka.com/article/24592/Saudi-king-followed-by-GCC-rulers-snubs-Obama-on-summit-US-fails-to-isolate-Netanyahu-on-nuclear-deal
Saudi King Salman's last-minute cancellation of his White House summit with US President Obama and his decision to send Crown Prince Mohammed bin Nayef in his place, is seen as a calculated snub for the president's policies on Iran and the Middle East. Two senior Gulf rulers then opted out of the Camp David summit Obama scheduled for Wednesday, May 13 at Camp David: Bahrain's King Hamad bin Isaa Al Khalifa and UAE Crown Prince Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al-Nahyan, leaving only the rulers of Qatar and Kuwait.
Saudi Foreign Minister Adel al-Jubeir announced Monday, May 12, that the king could not make the one-on-one White House summit Tuesday, May 12, because the five-day humanitarian truce in Yemen was due to start on that day.
But every informed source agrees that this was just an excuse to back out of the promise made to US Secretary of State John Kerry, when he visited Riyadh last week, that he would attend both the White House and the Camp David events."
Gulf sources reported that Obama's Gulf summit teetered after Kerry failed to sell King Salman the president's plan for a new US-led regional defense system for guarding against Iranian missiles. It was to be a shared response to Iran's nuclear program and regional expansion, and allay Gulf allies' concerns over the forthcoming nuclear deal with Tehran.
But Kerry informed Riyadh that Obama would not be ready to sign a written regional defense pact between the US and the Gulf Cooperation Council at the Camp David summit, as some Gulf rulers had insisted.
Washington and the GCC also remained sharply at odds on the Syrian war and the Bashar Assad's political future. The Saudis are not content with the US supplying the Syrian opposition for the first time with heavy weapons. They also want no-fly zones imposed over the war-torn country, arguing that weapons are not much use so long as the Syrian Air Force is free to strike rebel forces at will - and are armed by Iran, moreover, for chemical warfare.
The other bone the Saudis had to pick with the Americans was the Yemen war. They maintained to the Secretary of State that, while Obama was offering the region a hypothetic defense shield against Iran, at the same time, American assistance fell short of Saudi needs for beating back the Houthi rebels sponsored by Tehran. They complained especially about the lack of US naval protection in the Strait of Hormuz, the Strait of Bab el-Mandeb and the Gulf of Aden.
In Riyadh's view, the Obama administration is trying to walk a fine line between irreconcilable positions: Saudi Arabia's requirements, on the one hand, and Iran's illicit seizure of merchant ships in international waters, on the other. By accepting Tehran's demand for Iranian ships and planes to deliver "humanitarian aid" to Yemen, the Obama administration is opening the door to arms supplies for the Houthis and deeper Iranian intervention in Yemen.
All that Kerry achieved in his two days of talks in Riyadh was to obtain Saudi Arabia's consent to declare a five-day ceasefire for humanitarian aid to reach the stricken Yemen population.
But the most vexing issue between Washington and Riyadh continues to be the nuclear deal between Washington and Tehran which Obama is pushing to the exclusion of almost any other consideration.
debkafile's Gulf sources note that had Kerry been able to build Saudi and Gulf support for this deal, Israel's Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu would have been left hanging alone. By refusing to attend the summit convened by Barack Obama, Saudi King Salman is signaling that he is not going to default on the Middle East front lined up against the US president's Iranian venture.
BE SURE TO CHECK OUT MY ALL NEW PROPHECY AND CREATION DESIGN WEBSITES. THERE IS A LOT TO SEE AND DO..........
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.