Trump, the pistol and the olive branch

Trump, the pistol and the olive branch - Caroline B. Glick - http://jewishworldreview.com/0117/glick011817.php3

 

It will soon be Trump v. the world. Quite literally. Will America fall further into submission or lead?

 

With a gun on his hip, on November 13, 1974, PLO chief Yasser Arafat stood before the UN General Assembly and made the West an offer that it didn't refuse.

 

At the end of a long speech in which he rewrote history to erase all connection between the Jewish people and the Land of Israel and criminalized the very notion of Jewish freedom, Arafat declared, "Today I have come bearing an olive branch and a freedom fighter's gun. Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. I repeat: Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand."

 

Arafat's offer has served since that time as the foundation of European relations with the Palestinians and the wider Islamic world. It has also been the basis of US-PLO relations for the better part of the past four decades.

 

His trade was simple and clear.

 

If you stand with the PLO in its war to annihilate Israel and deny Jewish freedom, then PLO terrorists and our Arab state supporters will leave you alone.

 

If you refuse to join our war against the Jewish state, we will kill you.

 

Today, Arafat's successor, Mahmoud Abbas, is reiterating Arafat's offer.

 

Speaking Saturday at the Vatican after the Holy See decided to recognize "Palestine," Abbas said that if US President-elect Donald Trump goes ahead with his plan to move the US Embassy to Jerusalem, it will "fuel extremism in our region, as well as worldwide."

 

Abbas's spokesman was more explicit. Saturday night, Osama Qawasmeh, spokesman for Abbas's Fatah PLO faction and member of Fatah's Revolutionary Council, said that if the US moves its embassy to Israel's capital city, "The gates of hell will be opened in the region and the world."

 

Abbas and Qawasmeh also said that the PLO expects that members of the international community will make Trump see the light and abandon his plan.

 

French President Francois Hollande's "peace conference" on Sunday was the international community's way of fulfilling Abbas's demand.

 

As multiple commentators have noted, the conference's purpose wasn't to promote the prospects for peace. It was to constrain Trump's policy options for handling the Palestinian war against Israel.

 

By bringing together representatives of some 70 countries to insist that Israeli homeowners are the moral equivalent of Palestinian terrorists, Hollande and his comrades hoped to box Trump into their PLO-compliant policy.

 

Spelling out the demand Trump is required to accept, French Foreign Minister Jean-Marc-Ayrault parroted the Palestinian threats.

 

Asked by the French media Sunday if moving the US Embassy to Jerusalem would provoke the Palestinians, Ayrault said, "Of course."

 

He then demeaned Trump's plan to move the embassy as nothing but the regular bluster of American politicians.

 

In his words, "I think he [Trump] would not be able to do it. It would have extremely serious consequences and it's not the first time that it's on the agenda of a US president, but none has let himself make that decision."

 

Ayrault is correct about Trump's predecessors.

 

To one degree or another, since the early 1970s, successive US administrations have joined the Europeans in selling Israel down the river to prevent Arafat's minions from pointing their guns at the American people.

 

Like the Europeans, the Americans have upheld their side of this bargain even when the PLO failed to uphold its end. For instance, in 1973 Arafat ordered his terrorists to storm the Saudi Embassy in Khartoum and take US ambassador Cleo Noel, his deputy, George Curtis Moore, and Belgian diplomat Guy Eid hostage. Arafat then ordered his henchmen to murder the diplomats after then president Richard Nixon rejected his demand to release Robert F. Kennedy's Palestinian murderer, Sirhan Sirhan, from prison.

 

Instead of responding to the execution of US diplomats by siding with Israel against the PLO, the US covered up and denied the PLO's responsibility for the attack for the next 33 years.

 

The US is still covering up for the PLO's murder of US embassy personnel in Gaza in 2003. At the same time, it is providing the PLO with nearly three quarters of a billion dollars in direct and indirect annual aid, including the training and provision of its security forces.

 

The Europeans for their part have egged the US along throughout the years. France has generally led European efforts to convince the Americans to side with Palestinian as well as Hezbollah terrorists in their war against Israel in the name of "peace."

 

Sunday morning, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu dismissed the Paris conference as a "futile" relic of a period that is about to end.

 

Netanyahu said that the conference's goal of boxing Israel into an untenable framework for dealing the Palestinians was nothing more than the "final palpitations of a yesterday's world."

 

"Tomorrow," he intoned, "will look a lot different. And tomorrow is very close."

 

Trump will take office on Friday. Since he was elected, he has given every reason to believe that Abbas and his deputies and their European and American enablers will have to either put up or shut up.

 

Speaking of the president-elect, Henry Kissinger said that Trump is the first man in recent memory who doesn't owe anybody anything for his victory.

 

The only people he is answerable to are the voters who elected him.

 

Trump's electoral victory owes to his success in tapping into the deep reservoir of popular disaffection with the elitist culture and policies that have governed post-Cold War West. He has used the mandate he received from American voters to revisit the basic assumptions that have driven US policies for the past generation.

 

His skepticism at NATO and the EU are examples of his refusal to simply accept the received wisdom of his predecessors. Just this weekend he told Germany's Bild magazine that he continues to question the purpose of NATO, which is a drag on US taxpayers and doesn't fight terrorism.

 

He similarly restated his ambivalence toward the EU and that its open border policy has been a "catastrophic failure," and he expects more countries to follow Britain's lead and exit the EU.

 

Trump's position on the PLO and the Palestinian war on Israel is of a piece with his wider rejection of the common wisdom of Western elites. Just as he didn't hesitate to say that the EU mainly serves as an instrument for Germany to dominate the European market, so he has made no mystery of his rejection of the moral equivalence between Israel and Palestinian terrorists which forms the basis of the twostate formula.

 

Not only won't Trump join the Obama administration and the French in criminalizing Israeli homeowners, Trump is celebrating them. He has invited the leaders of Israeli communities in Judea and Samaria - that is, the so-called "settlements" - to attend his inauguration.

 

And he appears dead serious about moving the US Embassy to Jerusalem.

 

Under these circumstances, Israel has the opportunity and the obligation to end the PLO's ability to threaten the US, not to mention itself. It is Israel's duty to ensure that the next time the PLO tries to exact a price in blood for America's refusal to abide by the terms of Arafat's blackmail, his terrorist group is finally destroyed.

 

Similarly, Israel is now obliged to take the lead and abandon the PLO-friendly two-state policy, which blames Israel for Palestinian terrorism, and adopt a strategy that works in its place.

 

Netanyahu has refused to consider any alternative until after Barack Obama is out of office.

 

Consultations must be scheduled for Saturday night.