Kurdish oil is another  Netanyahu-Obama head-to-head front - http://www.debka.com/article/24834/Kurdish-oil-is-another-Netanyahu-Obama-head-to-head-front-
That  Israel and other nations were buying oil from the Kurdish republic of Iraq had  been published before and was no secret. The Financial Times broke its  "discovery" Sunday, Aug. 23, just by chance? on the day that Britain and Iran  reopened their respective embassies in Tehran and London after a four-year  breach resulting from a mob attack on the Tehran embassy. 
Even  before sanctions were lifted and Tehran had demonstrated its compliance with the  nuclear deal signed with the world powers in Vienna on July 14, European  ministers were knocking on the door in a quest for financial relations. The  Islamic Republic was deemed rehabilitated by the nuclear accord; and the UK saw  no reason to lag behind the others. And so Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond was  personally in attendance at the ceremonial reopening Sunday of the Tehran  embassy.
 The  FT's report's timing fitting in perfectly with the British government's plans to  quickly develop profitable ties with the Islamic Republic in the following  arenas:
1.  The oil industries in Iran and Iraq. London seeks as large a slice as possible  of the $150 billion worth of oil and gas contracts on offer by  Tehran.
2.   The Islamic Republic was also meant to infer from the FT report that British  intelligence resources and its powerful media were available as tools for  beating Israel out on the world's energy markets.
3.  Britain's foreign policy is grounded in accentuating its common interests with  Washington. The Obama administration may pose as a champion of Masoud Barzani,  President of the autonomous Kurdish Republic of northern Iraq. His peshmerga  army has after all distinguished itself in its dogged fight against the Islamic  State. But in practice, things are different:  the US administration, to  meet the wishes of Tehran and Baghdad, consistently withholds from the Kurds the  heavy weapons they need to rout ISIS.
The  pejorative depiction of Israel's purchase of Kurdish oil was meant to gain  London points - not just with Iran and Iraq, but also with the Obama White  House.
In  serving this purpose, The Financial Times found no editorial need to fill in the  pertinent Middle East background of the trade.
Exactly  a year ago, debkafile discovered and reported that Kurdish oil was being  delivered to Israel. Several media discovered an American warship that was  described at the time as stalking the United Kalvyrta tanker which carried a  million barrels of Kurdish oil. The warship planned to prevent the oil being  unloaded at any port, since Washington viewed the cargo as the legal property of  the Iraqi government - not the KRG which had put it up for sale. Had the oil  reached its purchasers, it would have been nearly impossible to cut off  Kurdistan's export trade to clients outside Iraq.
 This  American step was part and parcel of the US negotiating tactics for a nuclear  accord, then at one of their critical moments. The Obama administration was  anxious to show Tehran how closely the US would play ball with Iran and  Shiite-dominated Iraq on the vital issue of oil, once the nuclear accord was in  the bag.
 But  the episode did not pan out as expected.
 This  is what happened: "The partially full Kamari tanker carrying Kurdish crude oil  disappeared from satellite tracking north of Egypt's Sinai Peninsula. Two days  later, the empty vessel reappeared near Israel."
No  one in the trade doubted for a moment that the vanishing oil had been unloaded  at an Israeli port.
 In  reporting this at the time, a debkafile map traced the freight's route from the  Turkish port of Ceyhan, the terminus of the oil pipeline from the  Kurdish-controlled oilfields of Kirkuk, to the Israeli port of  Ashkelon.
 That  was the missing background of the Financial Times story, which led up to its  conclusion that Kurdish oil accounts for 77 percent of Israel's consumption,  totalling around a quarter of a million bpd. Between May and August this year,  the Haifa refineries are said to have handled 19 million barrels of oil sourced  to Kurdistan.
Since  all matters relating to energy are made in Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu's  office, it stands to reason that the decision to buy oil from the KRG came from  the top.
 Netanyahu's  readiness to go head to head with the Obama administration on this issue hat two  motives:
First,  Kurdish oil was cheap. Irbil denies undercutting the market, but debkafile's  sources report that it was willing to do so in the case of Israel.
 Second,  the Netanyahu government and the Obama administration don't see to eye to eye  not just on nuclear Iran, but on Middle East policy in general - and the  autonomous Kurdish republic of Iraq, in particular. The prime minister intended  for Barzani to use this oil revenue to buy the arms he needs to fight ISIS to  the finish.
 At  the time of this decision, crude had soared past $100 on the world market, and  Islamic State forces were advancing on the Kurdish capital of Irbil. Washington  may have countenanced Mosul's fall to jihadist forces, but Israel was determined  to prevent the fall of friendly Irbil.
This  week, as Netanyahu marked the first 100 days of his fourth term as prime  minister, his critics described him as weak and lacking in accomplishments. The  Kurdish enterprise was one of several cases in which he quietly took a strong  initiative.
BE SURE TO CHECK OUT MY ALL NEW PROPHECY AND CREATION DESIGN WEBSITES.  THERE IS A LOT TO SEE AND DO..........
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.