In the Heart of the Earth

 In the Heart of the Earth In 1995, Church of the Great God published AfterThree Days, a booklet I wrote explaining the timing of the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ. All these years later, I am still asked regularly to defend my assertions and dogmatisms in the face of the overwhelming belief in the Good Friday-EasterSunday of mainstream Christians. Frankly, many of those who challenge the booklet's argument react spasmodically rather than reasonably, having never considered that the Bible may present a scenario contrary to traditional preaching. Perhaps these people are subconsciouslyaware that if After Three Days is correct, a large chunk of mainstream Christian theology—Sunday-worshipin particular—crumbles to dust. Since the annual memorial of Christ's death has arrived once again, perhaps an addendum to the booklet's subject is in order. Obviously, as a booklet, After Three Days could not include an exhaustive study of every pertinent word and phrase, yet most of the rebuttals hinge on the meaning of such small elements in the Gospels' texts. Probably the most common argument holds that "three days and threenights" (Matthew12:40) does not mean precisely that but "parts of three days," allowing the one day and two nights between Friday sunset and Sunday at dawn to fulfill Jesus' prophecy. It does not; it means a complete 72 hours. Another frequent protest centers on John 20:1 and the phrase, "Now on the first day of the week . . .." Supporters of this argument claim that this time-marker points to when Jesus was resurrected, but the text itself refers only to Mary Magdalene's coming to the tomb at that time. The stonemust have been rolled away at some earlier time. Besides, the verse even says that she came to the tomb "while it was still dark," and Jesus was already gone! Yet, every burgh in Christendom features a sunrise service on Easter morning. Perhaps the most difficult textual problem to explain is the disciples' assertion, as they walked with Jesus to Emmaus on that same first day of the week, that "today is the third day since these things happened" (Luke24:21). To most, counting as we do, this would place the crucifixion on the previous Thursday, not Wednesday as the modern church of God has taught for the last century. However, this simple mathematical explanation is a bit superficial. Those who look at the counting of days from an inclusive point of view say that the disciples' phrasing points to the previous Friday since the Jews would have counted the currentday, Sunday, along with Saturday and Friday, to arrive at their three days. This would seem to support the traditional Good Friday-Easter Sunday scenario. Yet Jesus said, "The Scripture cannot be broken" (John10:35). Everywhere else, the gospels support a 72-hour burial from Wednesday at sunset to the weekly Sabbath at sunset. Can this verse in Luke 24 be a contradiction? There are two ways of resolving this ostensible inconsistency. The first considers that the disciples are not referring to just the three days of Jesus' burial. Then what are they talking about? They actually say, "Today is the third day since these things happened." To assume that they refer only to the crucifixion ignores the passage's context. In verse 18, Cleopas exclaims, "Are You the only stranger in Jerusalem, and have You not known the things which happened there in these days?" Fromthe summary of what they told Him, we can conclude that the disciples recounted the whole string of events that occurred in what we now call Crucifixion Week—and those events did not end with Jesus' death and burial. Matthew27:62-66 relates that on the day after Christ's crucifixion—Thursday, as we understand it—the Jews went to Pilate to ask that a guard be set on the tomb, and he told them to do it themselves. They may have done it immediately, but they may have waiteduntil sunset since the day was a High Day, a holy-day Sabbath, the first day of Unleavened Bread. So, on either Thursday or early Friday, a guard was set, making it the last activity surrounding the "big news" that the disciples told the resurrected Jesusabout. They could then say that it had been three days since the last of "these things" had occurred. The second, and perhaps best way, to understand this comment is to take it in its most natural sense. The immediately preceding thought is that the disciples "were hoping that it was He who was going to redeem Israel." The sign that Jesus hadgiven to them was of being "three days and three nights in the heart of the earth" (Matthew12:40). The sense of the following comment, however, is that their hopes had been dashed because the sign's three days and nights had already passed! The idiomatic phrase reads literally, "One is passing this day as the third," implying "the third dayhas passed." In essence, they were not saying it was the third day of Jesus' sign but, unfortunately, that the third day was already up! Finally, some try to say that the phrase "in the heart of the earth" in Matthew 12:40 does not mean being buried in a grave or tomb. Those who support this theory say that heart implies "middle of" or "midst of," and earth should really be translated as "country" or "world." Thus, the argument posits that Jesus is actually saying that He would be three days and nights in Jerusalem since it was the center of thenations, according to Ezekiel 5:5: "This is Jerusalem; I have set her in the midst of the nations and the countries all around her." Supporters do not say how Jesus' being in Jerusalem for this amount of time can act as a sign of His Messiahship. However, this argument holds no water. First, the Greek is literally translated here, as it is from a Hebrew idiom found in Jonah 2:2-3, the place to which Jesus referred in giving His sign. In that passage, "the heart of the seas" parallels "the deep," which Jonah in the previous verse calls "the belly of Sheol," which is the pit where the dead are laid or simply, the grave.So, the heart of the earth means "underground," just as the heart of the seas means "underwater." "In the heart of the earth," then, is a Hebrew metaphor signifying being dead and buried. Second, the similar sign Jesus gave in John 2:19, "Destroy this temple and in three days I will raise it up," is explained plainly in verse 21: "But He was speaking of the temple of His body." Though they use different metaphors, the two signs are the same: Being in the heart of the earth isthe result of having the temple of His body destroyed. Ergo, Jesus was not talking of His travel plans in Jerusalem but of His death, burial, and resurrection. Indeed, Scripture cannot be broken, as much as men try to cram their traditional beliefs into it. Would that they read the Bible for what it says rather than what they want it to say! - Richard T. Ritenbaugh