UNESCO, History, and Common Sense

UNESCO, History, and Common Sense - By Hal Lindsey - http://www.hallindsey.com/ww-4-21-2016/

 

Imagine yourself given two scenarios, and told to decide which is more credible.  Scenario One says that Jewish temples once stood on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem.  Scenario Two says that a horse named "Buraq" once flew the Prophet Mohammed to the "Seventh Heaven," using the Temple Mount as his launch pad.  Which is more credible - a flying horse carrying a man into outer space, or a temple on the Temple Mount?

 

You might think the temple is the obvious answer, but UNESCO, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, has decided to go with the story of Buraq the flying horse.  In a new, five page resolution called "Occupied Palestine," UNESCO denies any historical Jewish connection to the Temple Mount, while giving tacit support to the story of the astronaut horse.

 

Much of the Old and New Testaments center on the temples.  Not everyone counts the Bible as valid evidence, but secular history is also filled with references to the temples.  The first was built by Solomon and destroyed by Nebuchadnezzar.  Returning Hebrew exiles built the second temple.  Later, Herod completely rebuilt the second.  It was destroyed by the Romans led by Titus in 70 AD.

 

To the witness of history, you can add the science of archeology.  It provides overwhelming evidence of the temples' existence.  Today, even a trip to a garbage dump proves it.  Starting in 2005, archeologists began going through soil and debris removed from the Temple Mount when Muslim authorities constructed an underground mosque on the site.  Sifting through the illegally dumped debris, archaeologists have found hundreds of coins, pottery and other items dating back to the first and second temples.

 

Now look at Scenario Two.  Is there evidence that a horse named Buraq flew Mohammed from the Temple Mount in Jerusalem to some point beyond the stratosphere?  Muslims can only point to some writings in the Hadith, and a single verse from the Qur'an.

 

The Temple Mount is supposedly Islam's third most sacred site.  Yet a vague reference in that one verse to "the farthest Mosque" is the only thing Muslims can point to as a Qur'anic reference to Jerusalem or the Temple Mount.  Neither of them is mentioned by name in the entire Qur'an.

 

But the Bible speaks a great deal about the temples in both the Old and New Testaments.  Jesus walked there (John 10:23).  He taught there (Mark 11:27 and Luke 19:47).  When He was a boy, He had a profound discussion with the learned men of Israel there (Luke 2:46).  It was from there that Jesus cast out the money changers (Luke 19:45).  Peter and John prayed for the lame man there (Acts 3:11).  Jesus called the temple His Father's house (John 2:16).

 

Yet the UNESCO resolution speaks of the Temple Mount as an exclusively Muslim site.  The five page document never even uses the word "temple."  There is no acknowledgment in any way, or at any level of the long, deep Jewish connection to the mount.  There is only one-sided condemnation of Israel and all its activities.  The document never even hints at the lengths to which Israel has gone to accommodate the weird and unreasonable demands of Muslim activists.  For instance, Jews and Christians are forbidden to pray on the mount.

 

For the Temple Mount to be exclusively Muslim as UNESCO says, the temples could never have existed there.  Even the Western Wall, sometimes called the "Wailing Wall," is depicted in the report as wholly Muslim.

 

In a stunning turn from logic, the resolution calls the Western Wall "the Buraq Wall."  Buraq, as we just saw, was supposedly the name of Mohammed's flying horse.  The UNESCO document affirms a Muslim fable about a horse taking a man into outer space while denying established history.

 

You might expect Islamic nations to vote for this bizarre resolution, but so did France, Spain, Sweden, Slovenia, India, Russia, Argentina, and others.  What were they thinking?

 

In October of last year, even the New York Times made the mistake of questioning the historicity of temples on the Temple Mount.  They soon added two long corrections, admitting that scholars only debate the precise location of the temples on the mount, not whether they existed there.  They wrote, "All versions of the article should have made clear that the archaeological and historical uncertainties about the site - unlike assertions by some Palestinians that the temples never existed - do not directly challenge Jewish claims to the Temple Mount."

 

Give them credit for the correction, but the kind of thinking behind the first version of the article has spread across the world.  Supposedly educated people such as the reporters and editors of the New York Times, are falling for extremist Palestinian propaganda.

 

The PLO Charter says, "Claims of historical or religious ties of Jews with Palestine are incompatible with the facts of history."  That blatant lie stands at the heart of the Palestinian position on Israel.  It's scandalous that the governments of France, Spain, and Sweden agree.  No wonder Jews are exiting Europe at a rate not seen since the Nazis were in power.

 

Zechariah 14:2 describes a time near the end of the great tribulation when there will be a gathering of "all nations against Jerusalem."  We're not there yet, but the nations of the world are taking sides even now.  And increasingly, they're choosing against Israel.

 

When the UNESCO resolution created an international uproar, its Director-General, Irina Bokova, refused to back off, but tried to sound conciliatory.  She said, "Only respect and dialogue can build the trust we need to move forward."

 

How does a campaign to erase Jewish civilization from the annals of history show respect?  What about respect for truth? 

 

 

 

Where the UN and ISIS converge: Shining a spotlight on do-gooder hypocrisy - By Caroline B. Glick -

http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0416/glick042216.php3

 

Palmyra "carries the memory of the Syrian people, and the values of cultural diversity, tolerance and openness that have made this region a cradle of civilization."

 

Last month, UNESCO's director general Irina Bokova issued a statement congratulating Russian- backed Syrian forces for liberating the ancient city of Palmyra from Islamic State (ISIS).

 

Bokova said Palmyra "carries the memory of the Syrian people, and the values of cultural diversity, tolerance and openness that have made this region a cradle of civilization."

 

Bokova added, "The deliberate destruction of heritage is a war crime, and UNESCO will do everything in its power to document the damage so that these crimes do not go unpunished. I wish to remind all parties present of the absolute necessity to preserve this unique heritage as an essential condition for peace and the future of the region."

 

Last week, UNESCO's executive board passed a resolution unanimously outlining the steps the organization would take to rebuild the devastated site, whose major monuments were destroyed or damaged during the city's 10 months under ISIS rule.

 

All of this, is all very well and nice.

 

The problem is that UNESCO commits the very crimes for which it condemns ISIS. Indeed, it committed the crime of seeking to wipe out history, whose preservation is "an essential condition for peace and the future of the region," the day it passed its resolution on Palmyra.

 

Right after UNESCO's board unanimously passed its resolution on Palmyra, it also passed a resolution whose goal is to erase Jewish history in the land of Israel.

 

The resolution, titled merely "Occupied Palestine," (a country that doesn't even exist), defined the Temple Mount, Judaism's most sacred site, as an exclusively Muslim site. Jews who visit it were referred to derisively as "right wing extremists."

 

The Western Wall, Judaism's second holiest site, was similarly referred to as an exclusively Islamic site.

 

The resolution reinstated a previous resolution's false claim that the tombs of the patriarchs and matriarchs of the Jewish people in Hebron and Bethlehem are mosques. The resolution, like the one from last week, was also a war crime, where UNESCO acted with malice to destroy the historical record.

 

In another act of cultural aggression, whose goal is to destroy the historical record, in last week's resolution UNESCO falsely and maliciously referred to Jewish cemeteries as "fake graves," in "Muslim cemeteries."

 

And if that weren't enough, UNESCO denounced Israel for the "conversion of many Islamic and Byzantine remains into so-called Jewish ritual baths or into Jewish prayer places."

 

UNESCO's acts are not the ravings of lunatic extremists or genocidal imperialists shouting about caliphates, crucifying and enslaving innocents. The latest resolution was sponsored by supposedly moderate Islamic countries, two of which - Jordan and Egypt - have peace treaties with Israel.

 

Support for the resolution wasn't limited to Islamic countries voting as a bloc. France, Spain, Sweden, Slovenia, India, Russia and Argentina were among the nations who voted in favor of a decision that referred to the Western Wall in scare quotes.

 

 

The US sits on UNESCO's executive board despite its open anti-Semitism. By doing so, the US grants legitimacy to a body which is waging a culture war against Israel no less determined - and arguably no less criminal- than ISIS's war against all vestiges of non-jihadist culture in Syria, Iraq and throughout the world.

 

And why shouldn't it act in this way? Much of the cultural elite in the Western world has joined UNESCO in its campaign to erase Jewish civilization from the historical and scientific record.

 

UNESCO's culture war against Israel is of course led by the Palestinians. The entire Palestinian national narrative is based on a conscious cooptation and theft of Jewish history. The Palestinians themselves understand exactly what they are doing.

 

In 2011, The Guardian and al Jazeera published what they referred to as "the Palestine Papers." The papers were taken from the PLO 's negotiations support unit, charged with instructing Palestinian negotiators with Israel about their positions in the talks.

 

Among the papers was one that explained why the Jewish connection to the entire land of Israel - rather than just to Judea and Samaria - must be denied at all costs.

 

"Recognition of the Jewish people and their right of self-determination may lend credence to the Jewish people's claim to all of Historic Palestine," the document warned.

 

That document was nothing new. Rather, it was simply a restatement of the PLO Charter. The charter states, "Claims of historical or religious ties of Jews with Palestine are incompatible with the facts of history and the true conception of what constitutes statehood. Judaisim, being a religion is not an independent nationality. Nor do Jews constitute a single nation with an identity of its own; they are citizens of the states to which they belong."

 

PLO chief and Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas lives by these lies.

 

He has repeatedly denied the historical record, proclaiming that there was never a Jewish temple in Jerusalem and that Jews have no history in the land of Israel.

 

No Palestinian leader has ever disagreed with him.

 

Rather, the PLO has a long, unbroken record of committing war crimes no different from ISIS's in deliberately destroying Jewish antiquities, starting with the Temple Mount, which, since the PA was established in 1994 has been the focus of sustained campaign of destruction ordered by PA leaders and conducted by Palestinians.

 

Like the Temple Mount - the cradle not only of Judaism but of Christianity as well - so Jewish sites throughout Judea, Samaria and Gaza have been systematically plundered, torched, vandalized, turned into mosques and destroyed by the Palestinians, often acting on orders from the PA . The Shalom al Yisrael synagogue in Jericho was first destroyed immediately after the PA took control of the city in 1994. The same is the case of the ancient synagogue in Gaza. Joseph's Tomb and in Nablus was torched and turned into a mosque.

 

In 2014 UNESCO declared the ruins of Bar Kochba's fortress of Beitar a World Heritage Site. Except that they called it Battir. And they said it was a Roman site.

 

And they erased its Jewish roots, claiming the terraced agriculture the Jews of ancient Israel developed was a Roman innovation.

 

When UNESCO began considering Beitar's application for its protected status, The New York Times eagerly published its historical revisionism.

 

This is not surprising. The Times has repeatedly reported stories whose purpose is to erase the Jewish history of Israel. Last October, the Times published a story about the Temple Mount which cast aside mountains of evidence, gathered over decades by professional archaeologists, in order to question whether the Jewish temples were really located there.

 

In elite universities, students receive doctorates and go on to receive tenure despite, or perhaps due to their publication of politicized research, which free from evidence, demonizes Israel and Israelis as colonialist implants with no history or rights to Israel.

 

For instance, in 2007, Barnard College granted tenure to Nadia Abu El-Haj. In 2001, El-Haj, an anthropologist with no training or experience in archaeology, published Facts on the Ground: Archaeological Practice and Territorial Self-Fashioning in Israeli Society.

 

In her book, El-Haj alleged that Israeli archaeologists have deliberately falsified their findings. El-Haj claimed that the artifacts and sites they discovered and excavated were actually Islamic but the Jews hid the evidence. Jews, she said, also destroyed Christian sites with bulldozers.

 

Harvard Professor James Russell referred to her book as "malign fantasy," designed to demonstrate the "colonial essence" of Zionism by denying the history of "Jewish sovereignty and long historical presence."

 

But most of El-Haj's esteemed colleagues applauded her act of academic aggression against history and science. Her colleagues at Barnard rewarded her with tenure. Her colleagues throughout the academic world showered her book with applause.

 

In so doing, they, like the governments that supported the UNESCO resolution denying Jewish history, and condemning Israel for stubbornly defending its heritage, and like the New York Times and other elite publications that publish as fact Palestinian historical falsehoods, are committing the same war crime that ISIS committed in Palmyra. They are, in Bokova's words, engaging in "the deliberate destruction of heritage."

 

Just as Bokova pledged to document all of ISIS's war crimes against ancient heritage sites "so that these crimes do not go unpunished," so Israel should document the actions of UNESCO and its allies that aid and abet the destruction of Jewish heritage sites.

 

History itself will convict them.