WORLD AT WAR: 6.12.21 - Will the Next Globalist War Game Lead to Another World Crisis?

Will the Next Globalist War Game Lead to Another World Crisis? – Brandon Smith - https://www.prophecynewswatch.com/article.cfm?recent_news_id=4765 Back in April I published an article titled 'Globalists Will Need Another Crisis In America As Their Reset Agenda Fails'. In it I noted an odd trend which many of us inthe liberty media have become aware of over the years - Almost every major man-made catastrophe in the US and in many other parts of the world in the past couple decades has been preceded by a government or globalist "exercise". These exercises and war games tend to mimic the exact disaster that would eventually strike the public only days or weeks later. Sometimes the mock disaster exercises andthe real events happen at the same time. The Covid pandemic was no exception. It's quite miraculous... I have specifically outlined the bizarre "coincidence" of the World Economic Forum's Event 201 exercise, a war game co-funded by Bill Gates and Johns Hopkins and launchedin October of 2019. Event 201 simulated a global novel zoonotic coronavirus pandemic (supposedly spread from bats to people) that "required" a global lockdown response. Only two months later the real thing actually happened. Almost every aspect of the Covidevent has played out exactly as was practiced during the WEF war game. One very disturbing element of the Covid response has been the coordinated suppression campaign by Big Tech platforms from YouTube to Facebook and Twitter. This campaignhas sought to undermine or destroy any facts, data and opinions which run contrary to the government narrative on Covid, even if the official narrative on Covid ends up being completely wrong. The strategy was described in detail during Event 201 and it was executed with extreme efficiency among supposedly disconnected companies and governments around the world.It's almost as if they KNEW a coronavirus pandemic was about to happen, and they were already staged to control the public reaction well in advance. And let's be clear because I do not want to seem ambiguous; the World Economic Forum and their globalist partners have been the prime beneficiaries during the pandemic.As WEF head Klaus Schwab has excitedly noted over and over again, the pandemic is a perfect "opportunity" for globalists to fast track what they call the "Great Reset" agenda - A plan to completely dismantle the current political and economic framework ofthe world and rebuild it into a highly centralized socialist civilization in which they are in complete control and personal freedom is a faded memory. This is why recent revelations of Covid's probable lab origins are not at all surprising. Just mentioning this idea a year ago in social media was enough to get you banned.And, if you want to know where to find the truth, always look first to the subjects you are not allowed to discuss. As I stated in my article 'How Viral Pandemic Benefits The Globalist Agenda', published in January of 2020 at the very beginning of the outbreak: "I have a hard time ignoring the strange 'coincidence' of the high level biohazard labs in Wuhan in favor of the idea that the virus was launched by chance due to the odddiets of central Chinese people. Given the evidence it appears that the coronavirus was gestated in a lab, not in someone's bat and snake soup. In 2017, scientists outside of China warned that these labs were not secure and that a virus might escape one ofthe facilities.....I would use the term 'escape' loosely, as there is a possibility that this event was created intentionally..." Elites like Dr. Anthony Fauci (a close associate of Bill Gates and Bill Gates SR.) directly funded studies at the Wuhan Lab through the NIAID since 2015, and specificallyfunded the study of the infectious transfer of coronaviruses from bats to other mammals including humans. And yes, the NIAID was in fact involved in "gain-of-function" experiments using SARS and coronavirus variants at this time, despite Anthony Fauci claimingotherwise. The National Institutes Of Health's own website confirms this. All of these facts support the argument that Covid is a lab created bioweapon, and in my view according to the evidence so far it was released deliberately in close alliancewith the Chinese government. Fauci even somehow "predicted" in 2017 that Donald Trump would face a "surprise infectious disease outbreak" during his presidency, stating that "We will definitely get surprised in the next few years..." The scheme has certainly worked to an extent. In large portions of Europe, Asia and Australia the WEF is getting what it always wanted. However, the reset agenda appears to be failing in some parts of the world. In the US, resistance to the lockdowns as well as the experimental vaccines has grown exponentiallyto the point that dozens of states are now passing laws which prohibit enforcement of Covid restrictions and "medical passports". The alternative media has also proven resilient against censorship and information suppression, and we have been proven to be right time and time again. We were the firstpeople to warn that the death rate of Covid was being exaggerated (the WHO and other establishment institutions predicted a death rate of at least 3%, FAR above the reality). We were the first people to warn that the lockdowns and mask rules did nothing to stop the spread (states that removed restrictions ended up with FALLING infections anddeaths). And, we were the first people to warn that the virus was behaving more like a bioweapon, and that its origin was more likely the Level 4 lab in Wuhan, China, right down the street from the animal market that the Chinese government originally claimedwas the source of the outbreak. We were also the first people to warn that the pandemic would be used as a rationale for the enforcement of vaccine passports, which would create a two tear society designedto force people who do not want to take the mRNA vaccines into compliance. We have been proven right once again as the state of Oregon has become the first in the US to demand proof of vaccination (a passport) before residents are able to enter any businessesor establishments. We have consistently been called "conspiracy theorists" throughout this event by government bureaucrats and the media. But, we were were right about almost everything, andthe mainstream media has been wrong about almost everything. Either that, or they have been knowingly lying about almost everything. This dynamic is important to understand because I believe the situation is far from over and that more crisis events are about to be engineered (or they will magically happenby coincidence). My biggest concern right now is the upcoming 'Cyber Polygon' exercise being headed by the WEF this July. The war game is meant to "simulate" a cyberattack on vital infrastructurethat would lead to a shutdown of the global supply chain, or at least the supply chains within certain nations. As I warned in April, the timing of Cyber Polygon is suspicious. As the Covid lockdown agenda is breaking down in the US and the vaccine passports are not winning favoramong a large percentage of Americans, the globalists will need another crisis even if they hope to achieve their goals for their Great Reset. Only weeks after I published my initial concerns about Cyber Polygon, a massive cyberattack was reported which struck the 5,500 mile Colonial Pipeline. The pipeline suppliesgasoline to most of the eastern seaboard and after a week of being shut down numerous states were reporting gas shortages. The story has since quietly faded from mainstream news cycles. In the past few days, yet another major cyberattack has been reported against JBS, a meat company that supplies around 23% of all US beef and pork. Production at JBS hasshut down, and now there is the possibility of meat shortages across the country if the problems are not solved soon. Again, is it just coincidence that these large scale cyberattacks are happening with greater frequency in the lead-up to a WEF's Cyber Polygon simulation? Or, is Cyber Polygonanother Event 201? Is it a beta test for a disaster that is planned for the near future? The WEF is openly comparing future cyber attacks to Covid outbreaks, so I'm inclined to suspect the latter: The supply chain issue has come to the forefront in the wake of the pandemic as retailers have had to deal with intermittent shortages, and manufacturers are facing a lackof components. Not only that, but inflationary troubles are also weighing on supplies. That said, a cyberattack is another animal entirely; whether or not the event is real or staged, the supply chain is fragile because of global interdependency. In the US,there are many necessities that rely on foreign manufacturers or the "just in time" freight system. Preparedness and long term storage are not a part of the vocabulary of the common US business. I don't really know if the supply chain could be shut down completely using a cyberattack, but in combination with inflation and draconian pandemic restrictions, it is possibleto disrupt the flow of goods for weeks at a time. It is also impossible to predict how many people are prepared for such a calamity. My hope is that more than 30% of Americans have at least begun the path to prepping, but undoubtedly a majority of the country has not. All it would take is a couple weeksof shortages or a grid down scenario and most people would be facing starvation, among other things. If Event 201 is any indication, then we should remain vigilant and watch carefully for another major cyberattack affecting the supply chain within two months of the WEF'sCyber Polygon exercise in July. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Top US general warns of Iran, China and Russia in Middle East � Seth J. Frantzman - https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/top-us-general-warns-of-iran-china-and-russia-in-middle-east-670424 During a special briefing with US General Kenneth McKenzie, head of the US Central Command, the general warned about Iran�s destabilizing activities and the role of Russiaand China in the region. The briefing took place on Monday, when he discussed a visit to Iraq and Syria and US withdrawal from Afghanistan. �Another priority is deterring Iran�s destabilizing activities, which remains the biggest threat to stability in the Middle East,� he said. �I believe that our posture inthe region has had a deterrent effect on Iran and made it more difficult for them to deny attribution for their malign activities.� He said deterrence involves the US deploying ships, airpower and missile defense capabilities. Discussing the role of Russia and China, he noted they are seeking greater influence in the region and stronger ties with various countries. Since 2015, Russia has increasinglyintervened in Syria. Russia is also selling its S-400 to Turkey and has been welcomed by other US allies in the region, from Egypt to Saudi Arabia in recent years. Russia also has contractors in Libya and a footprint in Africa. Mckenzie noted that Russia andChina sense a decline in US �engagement� in the region. �China engaged with nearly every country in the region in 2020, using exploitative debt traps, the Belt and Road Initiative, and medical diplomacy with their vaccine, whichhas dubious efficacy, to try to expand its influence,� he said. �Russia is equally disruptive in the region, and their engagements are largely opportunistic and transactional. Russia seeks ways to position itself as an alternative to the West by offering tomediate regional conflicts, selling arms, offering military expertise, and participating in regional and multilateral organizations to advance their interests.� Discussing Syria, where the US has a close partnership with the Syrian Democratic Forces, which includes many Kurds, Christians, Arabs and other groups, McKenzie noted thatthe US was still in the fight in the war against ISIS. There are concerns among observers that the US may cut funding to the SDF, and there have been clashes in Manbij and Turkish threats to security. McKenzie said that in the long term, �we�d like to transitionthis to local security organizations that are going to be able to provide this kind of security without a significant investment and international support. That�s still in the future, but that is ultimately the direction that we would like to move.� The US is also continuing to support the Lebanese Armed Forces. Recent posts on social media have included messages of US support. Many wonder how the US can work closelywith the Lebanese army when Hezbollah has a massive control of Lebanon. The CENTCOM said that �we remain committed to supporting the Lebanese armed forces. They�re one of the elements of the Government of Lebanon that actually functions very well, and we believethey should continue to be the sole expression of military power of the state in Lebanon. I had a good visit there a couple of months ago where I met with the chief of defense.� He also stressed the importance of training for the Lebanese. The American general also addressed the US Fifth Fleet seizing a ship destined for Yemen that was alleged to be carrying weapons from Iran. It is at least the fourth shipseized in 18 months. Iran arms the Houthi rebels in Yemen with drones, missiles and other technology. Asked about the ship, the general said, �Yes, we seized a ship. It had a lot � seized the ship and a large number of weapons on it in very suspicious circumstances.We are still finalizing attribution for this because we want to be very careful before we go public with who we believe is associated with it.� He said that the US military continues to work closely with Saudi Arabia on improvement of their integrated air and missile defense. �That�s a very high priority for us,as it is with Saudi Arabia, because they are subjected to really an unceasing bombardment from the Houthis in Yemen through ballistic missiles, small drones, and land-attack cruise missiles. And these attacks are not helpful; they�re certainly not helpfulto try to find an end to the conflict in Yemen. And so we work very hard with the Saudis to enable them to defend themselves, so that work is going on and I�m pleased with the results that we�ve made.� The US has been criticized by some for supporting the Saudi-led war in Yemen. Saudi Arabia says it is supporting the government of Yemen against the Iran-backed Houthis.But the war has dragged on for years. The new US administration wants to shift to only helping Saudi defensive capabilities. �I am personally convinced the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia seeks a responsible political end to the conflict. I am convinced they�re willingto take significant steps to make that happen. Unfortunately, I do not believe the Houthis are ready to seize the moment, and they have an opportunity here to enter good-faith negotiations with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to bring an end to this conflict,� he said. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- VISIT: PROPHECY WATCHER WEEKLY NEWS: HTTP://PROPHECY-WATCHER-WEEKLY-NEWS.BLOGSPOT.COM