COVID UPDATE: 1.28.23 -

Global Elites Plan for Next Pandemic At Davos With Digital Vaccination Tracking – Tyler Durden - https://www.prophecynewswatch.com/article.cfm?recent_news_id=5855 The World Economic Forum’s Davos discussions often require some 'reading between the lines' to understand what is really being said by the globalist participants, but notmuch interpretation is needed these days. Ever since the pandemic event, along with the lockdowns and the attempts to introduce vaccine passports, establishment representatives have been far more open about theiragenda and their intentions for the future. After all, it was Klaus Schwab who called covid a 'rare but narrow window of opportunity' to implement the 'Great Reset' of the current economic and political order. The pastfew years have shown that the Davos crowd still clings to the fading pandemic panic as the “good old days” when they could have had anything they wanted, including total centralization. The globalists continue to refuse to address their many failures, but panels like the following say it all – They realize that the truth has hit the mainstream and far toomany people are now questioning the validity of the restrictions, mandates, masks and the mRNA vaccines. All of these measures have proven to be mostly useless in preventing viral spread, and now the negative side effects of the vaccines are being admitted to, at least to a point.All in all, the pandemic was not the golden opportunity that Klaus Schwab and the WEF expected. Their hopes and dreams now turn to a future pandemic, perhaps one with a far higher death rate that creates more exploitable public fear. Of special note in this panel, which includes former British PM Tony Blair and current head of Pfizer Albert Bourla, are comments made about the lack of unified agreementon political response. They do not go into detail here, but they may be referring to the refusal of some governments to pursue ongoing mandates and vaccine passports. Public resistance to such actions led directly to apprehension among government officials as to how far they could push their luck. Clearly, they decided they were playingwith fire because many of these leaders backed off. It was as if someone flipped a switch and the covid doom mongering suddenly slowed to a mere flicker of its former intensity. The group concludes that global institutions in the future need to put constant pressure on governments and, ostensibly, constant pressure on national populations in orderto get the results they desire. By extension, Africa is mentioned a few times during the panel as an example of the need for “equity” in pandemic response. What they don’t talk about is Africa’s lack ofcovid deaths despite around 65% of the continent being unvaccinated according to the New York Times world vaccine tracker. The African example as a control group for the unvaccinated has been a thorn in the side of globalists for the past couple years andobviously they want to change that. Another very interesting comment is made by Tony Blair, who calls for national digital infrastructure for tracking vaccinations. Blair suggests that to keep various nationalgovernments on board with the agenda, they would have to be convinced pandemic issues are 'continuing issues.' Albert Bourla addresses the possibility and challenges of producing vaccines in an even faster time frame to respond to new viral events. His conclusion? That regulators needto continue to keep doors open for Big Pharma in terms of expediency even when there is not a pandemic in play. The average vaccine takes at least 10 years of study for safety and long-term side effects; the covid vaccines were developed and administered in less than a year under emergencyauthorization. This new standard of minimized safety obstacles is what Big Pharma and the WEF want for all vaccines and drugs in the future. Bourla then admits to something, in an offhanded way, that many people have suspected: that the biggest challenge in the enforcement of mandates and widespread vaccinationwas public skepticism. Bourla and others refer to this as the 'politicizing' of the mandates, but it was really just resistance to authoritarianism, and it is something that frustrated globalist planning at every step. This can only be a good thing. At no point do the panel participants acknowledge the numerous studies showing the ineffectiveness of masking, the ineffectiveness of the lockdowns, the ineffectiveness ofthe vaccines, and the risks they entail. The reasons for public resistance are not important to them, only the ways in which they can gain greater compliance during the next viral event. -------------------------------- The WEF health collective - Bill Wilson � www.dailyjot.com One of the main areas that the World Economic Forum (WEF) focused on during its recent annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland was what they call health equity. Justifying acall for worldwide socialized medicine, WEF posted on its website: �Health inequities�gaps between the health of different groups�have long characterized global health. The persistence of these inequities reflects an urgent need to close the health gaps thatthreaten our progress on health.� WEF identifies these gaps as food, housing, safety, clean air and water, income and personal wealth. WEF seeks to close these gaps through a �collective� partnership between governments and corporations�in short�Communism. It�s communism rebranded with humanitarian and profit-motivating words. WEF calls for �mobilizing collective action around building a healthier world and by generating theknowledge base that supports such efforts�If corporate influence is aligned with the interests of health equity, it can dramatically scale up our capacity to promote health globally. Where the reach of public policy can be constrained by national borders andthe complexities of domestic politics, corporate policy can act nimbly, innovate on the fly and onboard new approaches in pursuit of health equity.� WEF goes on to suggest that corporations and banks could pledge to not support companies that do not alignwith the goals of health equity. It is wealth redistribution by �collective� action. The result is what we saw with COVID 19�government and the private sector working together to force lockdowns, mandate treatments and censor dissent. In the end, some getrich at the expense of many just like every communist experiment in history. And many die. As pilgrim father William Bradford wrote in 1650, �The failure of this experiment of communal service, which was tried for several years, and by good and honest menproves the emptiness of the theory of Plato and other ancients, applauded by some of later times�that the taking away of private property, and the possession of it in community, by a commonwealth, would make a state happy and flourishing; as if they were wiserthan God.� The WEF conspirators employ words like �health equity� to cause social division and herd people into believing it is, as the WEF says, �a moral imperative.� The idea of makinga person�s health the nose ring leading to tyranny is no novel thing. And it has prophetic implications as is written of the Beast in Revelation 13:17, �And that no man may buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name, or the number of his name.� Noway to buy or sell will affect your health. The WEF seeks to use health equity to control every aspect of your life. The biggest obstacle for the WEF is people resisting. Corporations will only go so far in supporting nonsense if people quit buying their goods.Mandates can only be enforced to the extent people submit. COVID is an example. These global efforts affect you personally. Take them personally and respond accordingly. -----------------------------