Are Jeremiah 49 and Ezekiel 38 the Same Prophecy? (Part 1) - By Bill Salus - http://www.raptureready.com/soap2/salus1.html
According to a long forgotten prophecy that is recently being rediscovered, Iran appears to be the subject of two differing end time's prophecies. That's right; Iran appears to have double trouble in the end times. One prophecy is described in Jeremiah 49:34-39 concerning ancient Elam and the other is in Ezekiel 38 regarding Persia. This article denotes the differences between Jeremiah 49:34-39 and Ezekiel 38 and 39. Several of these dissimilarities are substantial, which suggests that Jeremiah and Ezekiel are not describing the same prophetic event.
Jeremiah issued his prophecies concerning Elam about 596 BC. Jeremiah wrote about Elam about a decade before his contemporary Ezekiel prophesied about Persia in Ezekiel 38:5. Ezekiel's ministry spanned between 593-571 BC.[i] Modern day Iran is comprised of ancient Elam and Persia. Ezekiel was familiar with Elam according to Ezekiel 32:24-25, but he did not include Elam in the lineup of invaders in Ezekiel 38. As the remainder of this article points out, Elam was probably intentionally omitted, because it is the subject of its own distinctly different prophecy, outlined by Jeremiah.
Different Battle Zones
The events described in Jeremiah 49:34-39 take place inside of the borders of Iran. Jeremiah 49:35 informs that Iran is struck at the foremost of its might and this causes Iranian refugees to seek exile outside of their homeland.
Jeremiah 49:36 predicts that "the four winds from the four quarters of heaven" will be brought "against Elam." Jer. 49:37 declares that the "disaster" comes "upon" the Iranians. Jeremiah 49:38 informs that the Lord will "set" His "throne in Elam." These prophecies are geographically specific. They must occur within the borders of Elam, which is the Central Western region of modern day Iran.
Conversely, the Ezekiel 38 and 39 invasion, from start to finish, takes place in Israel according to Ezekiel 38:8, 16, 18, and 19 and Ezekiel 39:2, 4, 9, 11, and 17. At the time of the Ezekiel invasion, Israel may have enlarged their borders as a result of an IDF victory over the Psalm 83 countries, but there is no biblical basis to believe that any part of modern day Iran will be part of a future greater Israel.
There is one possible exception to the argument that Ezekiel 38 happens entirely within Israel, and it is found in Ezekiel 39:6 which says, "And I will send fire on Magog and on those who live in security in the coastlands." However, the "coastlands," already mentioned several times by Ezekiel (cf. Ezek. 26:15, 18; 27:3, 6-7, 15, 35), imply the farthest reaches of the known world."[ii]
Ezekiel 38 Conspicuously Omits Elam and the Psalm 83 Populations
The fact that Ezekiel 38 omits Elam from the very specific list of populations that coalesce with Russia against Israel could be telling. Neither Elam nor any of the Psalm 83 countries are included in the Ezekiel 38 coalition. I think this is a conspicuous omission on Ezekiel's part.
Ezekiel 38 and 39 provides an enormous amount of meticulous details about the entirety of the Ezekiel invasion. It includes the participants, the spectators, the battle zone, the motive, the destruction involved, and the important details surrounding the aftermath events, i.e. the mop-up of the war. Why would Ezekiel overlook Elam and Israel's prime enemies today that are listed in Psalm 83? After all, the Ezekiel invaders have to travel over the lands of the Psalm 83 countries to even get into Israel.
What about Psalm 83?
The first question to address is, was Ezekiel aware of Elam and the Psalm 83 populations of Edomites, Ammonites, Moabites, and seven other populations? The answer is yes! Ezekiel listed the various Psalm 83 populations by one or more names about eighty-nine times in his forty-eight chapters.
Ezekiel mentions Edom, Edomite, or Edomites six times. Ammon, Ammonite, or Ammonites are written about six times also. Moab, Moabite, or Moabites are identified by Ezekiel three times. Egypt, Assyria, Tyre, Philistia and most telling even Gebal are also included in Ezekiel's forty-eight chapters. In fact, Gebal, which is located in modern day Lebanon, is only listed in Ezekiel 27:9 and Psalm 83:7. Why does Ezekiel 27:9 include Gebal, but Ezekiel 38 omit Gebal from the list of invaders? It is safe to presume that if Gebal was a participant in Ezekiel 38, that Ezekiel would have included Gebal.
I believe the answer is quite obvious. The Psalm 83 populations are not involved in Ezekiel 38 and 39, because they are complicit in their own war prophecy. The Psalm 83 confederacy is probably soundly defeated prior by the IDF. The Psalm 83 prophecy is the subject of my book entitled, "Psalm 83: The Missing Prophecy Revealed, How Israel Becomes the Next Mideast Superpower," and accompanying DVD titled "America and the Coming Mideast Wars."
What About Elam; Did Ezekiel Know About Elam?
The second question is, what about Elam? Did Ezekiel know about Elam? If Elam didn't exist at the time, or if the prophet was ignorant of its existence, then that could logically explain the omission of Elam from Ezekiel 38. The truth is that Elam existed when Ezekiel 38 was penned, and the prophet was fully aware of its location at the time. Ezekiel actually issued a prophecy concerning Elam in chapter thirty-two.
Ezekiel authored his forty-eight chapters between 593-571 BC. By the time Ezekiel 38 was written, Elam had already been identified in Genesis 10:22, 14:1, 14:9, Isaiah 11:11, 21:2 22:6, and Jeremiah 49:25:25 49:34-39. In fact, apart from Daniel 8:2 and Ezra 4:9, Ezekiel 32:24-25 represents the last biblical inscriptions of Elam in the Old Testament.
As you read the pertinent Ezekiel verses below, note that they were probably written around 585 BC.[iii] This means that Ezekiel prophesied about Elam approximately eleven years after Jeremiah 49:34-39 was written.
"There is Elam and all her multitude, All around her grave, All of them slain, fallen by the sword, Who have gone down uncircumcised to the lower parts of the earth, Who caused their terror in the land of the living; Now they bear their shame with those who go down to the Pit. They have set her bed in the midst of the slain, With all her multitude, With her graves all around it, All of them uncircumcised, slain by the sword; Though their terror was caused In the land of the living, Yet they bear their shame With those who go down to the Pit; It was put in the midst of the slain." (Ezekiel 32:24-25)
Since these verses were penned after Jeremiah prophesied about Elam, Ezekiel appears to be providing supplemental information regarding the events of Jeremiah 49:34-39. Ezekiel prophesies that many unsaved (uncircumcised) Elamites will be slain by the sword. The prophet mentions the sword two times in this passage. This seems to correlate with Jeremiah 49:37, which says, "And I will send the sword after them Until I have consumed them."
Ezekiel connects more prophetic dots by acknowledging that Elam is guilty of causing "terror in the land of the living." The prophet also mentions this fact two times in these verses. Interestingly, Iran is notably the world's foremost sponsor of international terror. Below is a quote from the Council on Foreign Relations website.
"The U.S. State Department considers Iran the world's "most active state sponsor of terrorism." U.S. officials say Iran provides funding, weapons, training, and sanctuary to numerous terrorist groups--most notably in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Lebanon--posing a security concern to the international community."[iv]
In conclusion, part one points out that Iran is the subject of a double jeopardy in the end times. Jeremiah's ancient prophecies concerning Elam and Ezekiel's prophecies concerning Persia clearly take place in completely different battle zones. Additionally, Ezekiel seems to have intentionally excluded Elam from his very specific lineup of coalition members in the Gog of Magog invasion. These are two solid arguments against Jeremiah 49:34-39 and Ezekiel 38 and 39 being the same prophetic event.
In part two, several more reasons for separating these prophecies will be explored. Thus, we appear to have differing prophecies predicting the future of Iran in the Bible. In my new timely book entitled, Nuclear Showdown in Iran, Revealing the Ancient Prophecy of Elam, I explain why Jeremiah 49:34-39 probably precedes Ezekiel 38. The book is available at www.prophecydepot.com. The book also comes with a companion DVD of the same name.
[i] The dating of the Book of Ezekiel was taken from the Internet on 4/21/14 from this website link: http://www.internationalstandardbible.com/E/ezekiel-1.html
[ii] Quote taken from The Bible Knowledge Commentary in the section of Ezekiel 38:1-8.
[iii] The 585 BC date for the writing of Ezekiel 32 was taken from the Bible Knowledge Commentary: Old Testament in the commentary section of Ezekiel 32. "Ezekiel 32:17-21. Ezekiel's last of seven prophecies against Egypt came in the 12th year, on the 15th day of the month. The month was not named, but many interpreters assume it was the same month as the previous prophecy (v. 1). If so, the date of this message was March 17, 585 B.C."
[iv] Quote about Iran as a sponsor of terrorism was taken from the Internet on 4/23/14 at this website: http://www.cfr.org/iran/state-sponsors-iran/p9362
According to a long forgotten prophecy that is recently being rediscovered, Iran appears to be the subject of two differing end time's prophecies. That's right; Iran appears to have double trouble in the end times. One prophecy is described in Jeremiah 49:34-39 concerning ancient Elam and the other is in Ezekiel 38 regarding Persia. This article denotes the differences between Jeremiah 49:34-39 and Ezekiel 38 and 39. Several of these dissimilarities are substantial, which suggests that Jeremiah and Ezekiel are not describing the same prophetic event.
Jeremiah issued his prophecies concerning Elam about 596 BC. Jeremiah wrote about Elam about a decade before his contemporary Ezekiel prophesied about Persia in Ezekiel 38:5. Ezekiel's ministry spanned between 593-571 BC.[i] Modern day Iran is comprised of ancient Elam and Persia. Ezekiel was familiar with Elam according to Ezekiel 32:24-25, but he did not include Elam in the lineup of invaders in Ezekiel 38. As the remainder of this article points out, Elam was probably intentionally omitted, because it is the subject of its own distinctly different prophecy, outlined by Jeremiah.
Different Battle Zones
The events described in Jeremiah 49:34-39 take place inside of the borders of Iran. Jeremiah 49:35 informs that Iran is struck at the foremost of its might and this causes Iranian refugees to seek exile outside of their homeland.
Jeremiah 49:36 predicts that "the four winds from the four quarters of heaven" will be brought "against Elam." Jer. 49:37 declares that the "disaster" comes "upon" the Iranians. Jeremiah 49:38 informs that the Lord will "set" His "throne in Elam." These prophecies are geographically specific. They must occur within the borders of Elam, which is the Central Western region of modern day Iran.
Conversely, the Ezekiel 38 and 39 invasion, from start to finish, takes place in Israel according to Ezekiel 38:8, 16, 18, and 19 and Ezekiel 39:2, 4, 9, 11, and 17. At the time of the Ezekiel invasion, Israel may have enlarged their borders as a result of an IDF victory over the Psalm 83 countries, but there is no biblical basis to believe that any part of modern day Iran will be part of a future greater Israel.
There is one possible exception to the argument that Ezekiel 38 happens entirely within Israel, and it is found in Ezekiel 39:6 which says, "And I will send fire on Magog and on those who live in security in the coastlands." However, the "coastlands," already mentioned several times by Ezekiel (cf. Ezek. 26:15, 18; 27:3, 6-7, 15, 35), imply the farthest reaches of the known world."[ii]
Ezekiel 38 Conspicuously Omits Elam and the Psalm 83 Populations
The fact that Ezekiel 38 omits Elam from the very specific list of populations that coalesce with Russia against Israel could be telling. Neither Elam nor any of the Psalm 83 countries are included in the Ezekiel 38 coalition. I think this is a conspicuous omission on Ezekiel's part.
Ezekiel 38 and 39 provides an enormous amount of meticulous details about the entirety of the Ezekiel invasion. It includes the participants, the spectators, the battle zone, the motive, the destruction involved, and the important details surrounding the aftermath events, i.e. the mop-up of the war. Why would Ezekiel overlook Elam and Israel's prime enemies today that are listed in Psalm 83? After all, the Ezekiel invaders have to travel over the lands of the Psalm 83 countries to even get into Israel.
What about Psalm 83?
The first question to address is, was Ezekiel aware of Elam and the Psalm 83 populations of Edomites, Ammonites, Moabites, and seven other populations? The answer is yes! Ezekiel listed the various Psalm 83 populations by one or more names about eighty-nine times in his forty-eight chapters.
Ezekiel mentions Edom, Edomite, or Edomites six times. Ammon, Ammonite, or Ammonites are written about six times also. Moab, Moabite, or Moabites are identified by Ezekiel three times. Egypt, Assyria, Tyre, Philistia and most telling even Gebal are also included in Ezekiel's forty-eight chapters. In fact, Gebal, which is located in modern day Lebanon, is only listed in Ezekiel 27:9 and Psalm 83:7. Why does Ezekiel 27:9 include Gebal, but Ezekiel 38 omit Gebal from the list of invaders? It is safe to presume that if Gebal was a participant in Ezekiel 38, that Ezekiel would have included Gebal.
I believe the answer is quite obvious. The Psalm 83 populations are not involved in Ezekiel 38 and 39, because they are complicit in their own war prophecy. The Psalm 83 confederacy is probably soundly defeated prior by the IDF. The Psalm 83 prophecy is the subject of my book entitled, "Psalm 83: The Missing Prophecy Revealed, How Israel Becomes the Next Mideast Superpower," and accompanying DVD titled "America and the Coming Mideast Wars."
What About Elam; Did Ezekiel Know About Elam?
The second question is, what about Elam? Did Ezekiel know about Elam? If Elam didn't exist at the time, or if the prophet was ignorant of its existence, then that could logically explain the omission of Elam from Ezekiel 38. The truth is that Elam existed when Ezekiel 38 was penned, and the prophet was fully aware of its location at the time. Ezekiel actually issued a prophecy concerning Elam in chapter thirty-two.
Ezekiel authored his forty-eight chapters between 593-571 BC. By the time Ezekiel 38 was written, Elam had already been identified in Genesis 10:22, 14:1, 14:9, Isaiah 11:11, 21:2 22:6, and Jeremiah 49:25:25 49:34-39. In fact, apart from Daniel 8:2 and Ezra 4:9, Ezekiel 32:24-25 represents the last biblical inscriptions of Elam in the Old Testament.
As you read the pertinent Ezekiel verses below, note that they were probably written around 585 BC.[iii] This means that Ezekiel prophesied about Elam approximately eleven years after Jeremiah 49:34-39 was written.
"There is Elam and all her multitude, All around her grave, All of them slain, fallen by the sword, Who have gone down uncircumcised to the lower parts of the earth, Who caused their terror in the land of the living; Now they bear their shame with those who go down to the Pit. They have set her bed in the midst of the slain, With all her multitude, With her graves all around it, All of them uncircumcised, slain by the sword; Though their terror was caused In the land of the living, Yet they bear their shame With those who go down to the Pit; It was put in the midst of the slain." (Ezekiel 32:24-25)
Since these verses were penned after Jeremiah prophesied about Elam, Ezekiel appears to be providing supplemental information regarding the events of Jeremiah 49:34-39. Ezekiel prophesies that many unsaved (uncircumcised) Elamites will be slain by the sword. The prophet mentions the sword two times in this passage. This seems to correlate with Jeremiah 49:37, which says, "And I will send the sword after them Until I have consumed them."
Ezekiel connects more prophetic dots by acknowledging that Elam is guilty of causing "terror in the land of the living." The prophet also mentions this fact two times in these verses. Interestingly, Iran is notably the world's foremost sponsor of international terror. Below is a quote from the Council on Foreign Relations website.
"The U.S. State Department considers Iran the world's "most active state sponsor of terrorism." U.S. officials say Iran provides funding, weapons, training, and sanctuary to numerous terrorist groups--most notably in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Lebanon--posing a security concern to the international community."[iv]
In conclusion, part one points out that Iran is the subject of a double jeopardy in the end times. Jeremiah's ancient prophecies concerning Elam and Ezekiel's prophecies concerning Persia clearly take place in completely different battle zones. Additionally, Ezekiel seems to have intentionally excluded Elam from his very specific lineup of coalition members in the Gog of Magog invasion. These are two solid arguments against Jeremiah 49:34-39 and Ezekiel 38 and 39 being the same prophetic event.
In part two, several more reasons for separating these prophecies will be explored. Thus, we appear to have differing prophecies predicting the future of Iran in the Bible. In my new timely book entitled, Nuclear Showdown in Iran, Revealing the Ancient Prophecy of Elam, I explain why Jeremiah 49:34-39 probably precedes Ezekiel 38. The book is available at www.prophecydepot.com. The book also comes with a companion DVD of the same name.
[i] The dating of the Book of Ezekiel was taken from the Internet on 4/21/14 from this website link: http://www.internationalstandardbible.com/E/ezekiel-1.html
[ii] Quote taken from The Bible Knowledge Commentary in the section of Ezekiel 38:1-8.
[iii] The 585 BC date for the writing of Ezekiel 32 was taken from the Bible Knowledge Commentary: Old Testament in the commentary section of Ezekiel 32. "Ezekiel 32:17-21. Ezekiel's last of seven prophecies against Egypt came in the 12th year, on the 15th day of the month. The month was not named, but many interpreters assume it was the same month as the previous prophecy (v. 1). If so, the date of this message was March 17, 585 B.C."
[iv] Quote about Iran as a sponsor of terrorism was taken from the Internet on 4/23/14 at this website: http://www.cfr.org/iran/state-sponsors-iran/p9362
Are Jeremiah 49 and Ezekiel 38 the Same Prophecy? (Part 2) - By Bill Salus - http://www.raptureready.com/soap2/salus2.html
Part one of this article pointed out that Iran is the subject of dual unfulfilled foretelling's. About 2600 years ago, the prophets Jeremiah and Ezekiel issued parallel end time prophecies concerning the rogue Islamic nation. Jeremiah wrote about Elam, and Ezekiel penned predictions for Persia. Ezekiel knew about Elam, but seemingly opted to omit Elam from his prophecy regarding Persia. These prophecies clearly find fulfillment in different geographies, but there are other distinguishing differences that separate these two forthcoming events.
The Meshech and Tubal Clue
This next section continues to answer the question presented in part one, as to whether Ezekiel intentionally omitted Elam from Ezekiel 38 and 39. It has already been shown that Ezekiel was familiar with Elam, but there is more to consider concerning his omission of Elam. The conclusive clue for me is contained in Ezekiel's multiple references of Meshech and Tubal. Ezekiel writes about this dynamic duo in Ezekiel 32:26-28, 38:2-3, 39:1.
Ezekiel 32: Meshech, Tubal and Elam (no Persia)
Ezekiel 32:1-32 identifies seven significant populations among the slain. These peoples are listed in the order of Egypt, Assyria, Elam, Meshech, Tubal, Edom, and Sidon. It is important to notice that Persia is not listed anywhere in Ezekiel 32. Iran was primarily identified by the western world as Persia until 1935. Modern day Iran is included in Ezekiel 32, but only under the banner of Elam!
Ezekiel 38: Meshech, Tubal and Persia (no Elam)
With the exceptions of Meshech and Tubal, Ezekiel 38 and 39 provides a lengthy list of entirely different populations than Ezekiel 32. These two peoples from Meshech and Tubal are alluded to in both Ezekiel 32 and Ezekiel 38. Ezekiel 38 and 39 includes Magog, Rosh, Meshech, Tubal, Persia, Ethiopia, Libya, Gomer and Togarmah. These nine comprise the Ezekiel invaders. Notice that Elam is not listed anywhere in Ezekiel 38!
Ezekiel 32:26-28 May be Part of Ezekiel 38 and 39
Meshech and Tubal were the sons of Japeth, who was Noah's youngest son, according to Genesis 9:18. Both Meshech and Tubal settled in what is today modern day Turkey. In tandem, they show up together seven times in the Holy Scriptures, but only in Ezekiel 32 and 38 and 39 are they depicted in Bible prophecies.
"Now the word of the LORD came to me, saying, "Son of man, set your face against Gog, of the land of Magog, the prince of Rosh, Meshech, and Tubal, and prophesy against him, and say, 'Thus says the Lord GOD: "Behold, I am against you, O Gog, the prince of Rosh, Meshech, and Tubal." (Ezekiel 38:1-3; emphasis added)
"And you, son of man, prophesy against Gog, and say, 'Thus says the Lord GOD: "Behold, I am against you, O Gog, the prince of Rosh, Meshech, and Tubal; and I will turn you around and lead you on, bringing you up from the far north, and bring you against the mountains of Israel. (Ezek. 39:1-2; emphasis added)
These above verses from Ezekiel 38 and 39 include three out of the four prophetic biblical references to Meshech and Tubal. They are clearly identified as members of the Gog of Magog invaders that come to take a spoil from Israel in the latter years according to Ezekiel 38:1-13.
Ezekiel 32 taken in correlation appears to add some concluding details surrounding the destruction of Meshech and Tubal.
"There are Meshech and Tubal and all their multitudes, With all their graves around it, All of them uncircumcised, slain by the sword, Though they caused their terror in the land of the living. They do not lie with the mighty Who are fallen of the uncircumcised, Who have gone down to hell with their weapons of war; They have laid their swords under their heads, But their iniquities will be on their bones, Because of the terror of the mighty in the land of the living. Yes, you shall be broken in the midst of the uncircumcised, And lie with those slain by the sword." (Ezekiel 32:26-28)
In my book titled, Nuclear Showdown in Iran, Revealing the Ancient Prophecy of Elam, I explain in greater detail the potential connections between Meshech's and Tubal's involvement in Ezekiel 32:26-28 and Ezekiel 38 and 39.
Iran's Double Jeopardy: Persia is in Ezekiel 38, but Elam is in Ezekiel 32
At this point, it's important to discuss Iran's double jeopardy in the latter days. Iran is the subject of dual judgment prophecies, one in Jeremiah 49:34-39, and the other in Ezekiel 38 and 39. This means that the rogue nation will experience double trouble in the end times.
One of the strongest arguments for believing that Jeremiah's prophecy concerning Elam is not part of Ezekiel 38 is found in the observable omission of Elam in Ezekiel 38. Elam's exclusion from Ezekiel 38 appears to be intentional.
The prior section pointed out that Ezekiel was extremely familiar with Elam, Meshech and Tubal, because he predicted their final fates in Ezekiel 32. The prophet includes Elam in Ezekiel 32:24-25 and Meshech and Tubal in Ezekiel 32:26-28. These verses neatly blend into one another on the pages of the Bible. This congruency possibly suggests that Elam's judgment closely precedes that of Meshech and Tubal.
The astute Bible prophecy buff would be remiss not ask the following questions;
1.) Why would Ezekiel lump Elam and Meshech and Tubal together in Ezekiel 32, but extract Elam from Ezekiel 38, which also incorporates Meshech and Tubal?
2.) Why would Ezekiel substitute Persia in place of Elam in Ezekiel 38 alongside Meshech and Tubal?
3.) Does this imply that Elam is the subject of its own prophecy, written by Ezekiel's contemporary Jeremiah, and is not involved in Ezekiel 38?
As Ezekiel is not physically with us today, I will go out on a limb and take advantage of author liberties by answering these questions as I believe he might. These answers will be presented in the language of our modern day vernacular. Treat the segment below as fiction that may not be too far-fetched.
1.) The answer to question #1 is as follows:
"Elam is the subject of its own independent prophecy. Elam was not included in Ezekiel 38 because it is not part of this prophecy. Elam experiences the disaster revealed by Jeremiah 49:34-39 before Ezekiel 38 even occurs. Elam is listed in correlation with Meshech and Tubal in Ezekiel 32 because Jeremiah 49:34-39 is quickly followed by Ezekiel 38."
2.) The answer to question #2 is as follows:
"Persia was identified in Ezekiel 38, because the Iranian Muslims that survive the disaster of Jeremiah 49:34-39, will coalesce with Russia for revenge against Israel. Iranian leaders will be dwelling in a weakened condition and extremely vulnerable after the fulfillment of Jeremiah's prophecy. Russian promises of restoration to religious, economic and military prominence will allure the Iranian leadership, hook, line, and sinker into the Magog Coalition. Iran will be allured by Russia's evil plan to capture Israel's inherent wealth of gas and other natural resources, along with the spoils of war captured by the IDF in the aftermath of Psalm 83. Iran will be among the first to enlist as an Ezekiel invader along with Turkey, (Meshech and Tubal)."
3.) The answer to question #3 is as follows:
"The majority of surviving Elamites (Iranians) will be exiled globally and seek no part in the Gog of Magog invasion. Very few will return to fight alongside Russia, but many will come to a saving faith in the Messiah. They will have learned an invaluable lesson about the fatal flaws of the rogue Islamic regime and will flee to Christ for their peace and restitution. Many of the Iranians in their Diaspora will preach the gospel throughout the world."
Other Reasons Jeremiah 49:34-39 and Ezekiel 38 and 39 Differ
There are several other reasons why Jeremiah 49 and Ezekiel 38 may not be referring to the same prophecy. They are summarized below.
· Good is in Elam's future, but not Persia's.
Good is in store for Elam according to Jeremiah 49:38-39, but nothing good is in store for Persia.
"I will set My throne in Elam, And will destroy from there the king and the princes,' says the LORD. 'But it shall come to pass in the latter days: I will bring back the captives of Elam,' says the LORD." (Jer. 49:38-39, NKJV).
There is no mention anywhere within the Bible of the Lord establishing His throne in Persia, or restoring the Persians back to Iran in the latter days. This is why it is important for Iranians today to receive Christ now, and fortunately many are.
Iran is presently the fastest growing evangelical population in the world. Iran's Christian population is burgeoning at a 19.6% annual growth rate. Conversely, the evangelical population of the USA is slumping along at about a sluggish 0.8% pace.[i] American Christians can learn a valuable lesson from the evangelical harvest taking place in Iran.
· Elam and Persia are Different Geographical Locations.
Not only do the battlefields differ in the prophecies involving Elam and Persia, but they both occupied different geographical locations. When Ezekiel and Jeremiah authored their prophecies, Elam was located in the West Central region of modern day Iran, extending somewhat into Southwest Iran, while Persia covered most of the rest of modern day Iran. They were separated by the Zagros mountains. It wasn't until several decades after these prophets wrote, during the time of Cyrus the Great of Persia, that the territorial lines became somewhat blurred.
It is clumsy and potentially careless to lump Jeremiah 49:34-39 concerning Elam, with Ezekiel 38 and 39 that deals with Persia. Even though Iran today encompasses both ancient regions, this does not insulate the country from territorial judgments predicted millenniums ago in the Bible.
· Elam Has Enemies, But Persia Has an Enemy.
Jeremiah 49:37 points out that Elam has a plurality of enemies. On the contrary, Persia appears to have only one, and that is Israel. Although Ezekiel 38:13 identifies some sideline spectators, they do not appear to become involved in the defeat of the Ezekiel invaders. Ezekiel 38:18-39:6 informs us that the God of Israel defeats Russia and its coalition.
· Elam is Defeated by the Sword, but Persia by Fire, Hail, and Brimstone
Jeremiah 49:37 predicts Elam's destruction occurs via the sword, which probably alludes to a military victory. Whereas, Ezekiel 38:18-39:6 declares that an earthquake, flooding rain, great hailstones, fire, and brimstone are the weapons of warfare that the Lord uses to defeat the Ezekiel invaders.
This two part article was taken from my book entitled, Nuclear Showdown in Iran, Revealing the Ancient Prophecy of Elam. The book is a non-fiction thriller taking the reader on a journey of discovery through the eyes of the prophets and the minds of today's key national players. The ancient prophecy of Elam will reveal what God has ordained, what the prophets saw and what you need to know and do now.
BE SURE TO CHECK OUT MY PROPHECY WEBSITES...............................
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.