Fantasy Land - By Daymond Duck - http://www.raptureready.com/featured/duck/dd170.html
Television pundits are constantly saying that they don't understand:
1. Pres. Obama's flawed and dangerous foreign policy.
2. His decision to go on a global apology tour.
3. His decision to make illegal recess appointments.
4. His decision to characterize the Fort Hood murders as workplace violence.
5. His decision to swap five terrorists for a deserter.
6. His decision to lie to the UN about a Benghazi video.
7. His refusal to close America's border with Mexico even though violent gang members and Islamic State terrorists are crossing into the U.S.
8. His support for a nuclear power plant in Iran while opposing nuclear power plants in the U.S.
9. His decision to let hundreds of thousands of Muslims into the U.S. without checking them out while refusing to let Christians into the U.S.
10. His decision to practically destroy America's military even though the world is getting more dangerous.
11. His decision to cancel America's space shuttle program.
12. His decision to explode America's debt and on and on it goes.
Pres. Obama pulled America's troops out of Iraq against the advice of many experts and now many say it was a great failure. He calls Yemen his success story but America's Ambassador and troops practically had to run from the country. He has been bombing the Islamic State terrorists in Syria for months, but Bashar Assad says the Islamic State now has more troops than they had when Pres. Obama started dropping the bombs.
His P5 + 1 team negotiated with Iran over her nuclear weapons program for years, but an Iranian defector that was covering the negotiations said Pres. Obama's team was negotiating on behalf of Iran instead of the P5 + 1. Iran's Ayatollah Khomeini recently called for "Death to America" but Pres. Obama negotiated a deal to let him have nuclear bombs and intercontinental missiles.
Perhaps, Pres. Obama's incoherence is why Prime Minister Netanyahu thinks Pres. Obama's negotiating skills are "dangerous to humanity" and it could figure into why a recent poll shows that more than one-third of Republicans think Pres. Obama is a more imminent threat to America than is Vladimir Putin of Russia or Bashar Assad of Syria.
Simply put: Pres. Obama makes illogical decisions that astound multitudes of rational pundits. Many with brilliant minds compare him to the inept Neville Chamberlain because they don't have words to adequately describe his near total lack of sound judgment. They are disturbed by his flawed thinking because Chamberlain's negotiations helped bring on WW II.
Pres. Obama's attitude toward Iran is a prime example of his muddled mind.
Many world leaders call Iran the world's number one state sponsor of terrorism. Past American presidents have kept this "worst in the world" state sponsor of terrorism on America 's terrorist list for years. Its supreme leader of Islamic state run terrorism is the Ayatollah Khomeini a man who imprisons and tortures people.
This Iranian leader supports terrorist groups in Iraq that killed hundreds of U.S. soldiers in that country; Hamas in Gaza that has fired hundreds of rockets and missiles into Israel, and the strongly anti-American Houthis in Yemen that have just toppled the government in violation of at least two UN resolutions (1747 and 2140).
One of Khamenei's advisors recently bragged that Iran has now taken control of four capitals: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Yemen. Others often brag that they are building a nuclear bomb to destroy Israel. The IAEA recently warned that Iran is hiding some of its nuclear weapons facilities that it is supposed to disclose.
There is more, but even though Iran has been involved in all of these things, Pres. Obama recently removed Iran from America's 2015 "Worldwide Threat Assessment of the U.S. Intelligence Community."
Many in Washington and the U.S. military say it is an absurd decision, but Pres. Obama believes those who question what he is doing are traitors and he actually believes that he can make friends out of Iran's pack of killers. He is even willing to trust these proven killers with nuclear weapons to get their signature on a document that former U.S. Ambassador to the UN, John Bolton, believes they will violate "before the ink is dry."
Pres. Obama's attitude toward Israel is another prime example of his muddled mind. Many American leaders call Israel America's best ally. Israel is a democratic nation that holds free elections, consistently votes with the U.S. at the UN; lets the U.S. store equipment, weapons, food and more inside their country; helps the U.S. protect the oil fields of the Middle East, helps the U.S. develop weapons and shares technology and intelligence reports with the U.S. and more.
The late Senator Jesse Helms called Israel "America's aircraft carrier in the Middle East." Sen. Marco Rubio asked, "If America doesn't stand with Israel, who would we stand with?" And yet, for some incomprehensible reason Pres. Obama treats the murdering Ayatollahs and Mullahs of Iran better than he treats Prime Minister Netanyahu of Israel. His actions lack common sense and sound judgment.
The idea that America can trust Iran is a dangerous fantasy. The idea that Pres. Obama can abandon Israel without America coming under the strong and irresistible judgment of God is fantasy. His thinking is unsafe at best and anti-Semitic, traitorous and blasphemous at worst. It is either deranged or evil and neither one is good for America or the world.
Many world leaders no longer respect Mr. Obama's decisions. To them the idea that he is the anointed one is ludicrous. But many Republicans, virtually all of the Democrats and most of the major U.S. media are still living in fantasy land. It now looks like it is going to take an act of God to awaken them.
Prophecy Plus Ministries
Daymond & Rachel Duck
Birds of a feather - Bill Wilson - www.dailyjot.com
This past weekend, the US "president" met with the "president" of Cuba. While both are "presidents" of their respective countries, one is elected and the other is a dictator. One has been behaving illegally like a dictator, the other just assumed power from his dictator brother. This marked the first official meeting of the US and Cuban leaders since the communist takeover of Cuba in the 1960s and the infamous Cuban missile crisis in 1962. The two had a "kumbya" moment where they both faced the news media and agreed that they would work to thaw relations between the two countries, and in some areas, "agree to disagree." Cuban dictator Raul Castro, however, revealed an intimacy that should raise eyebrows.
In a speech before the historic meeting, Castro reviewed his version of Latin American history, blaming America for thousands of deaths, imperialism and the cause of poverty through a list of biased revisionism. He admitted that from an "imperialist viewpoint," Cuba has acted in solidarity with terrorists, but only from a position as a humanitarian. When finished, he said, "The passion comes out of my pores when the revolution is involved, but I want to apologize to [sic to the US president] because he doesn't have anything to do with all of that. All (the previous US presidents) are indebted to us, but not [sic this US president]," who is an "honest man ... with a manner about him that speaks to his humble origins."
Let us remember August 2008 when Fidel Castro endorsed either Hillary Clinton or the current "president" for US President. In October 2008, the Communist Party USA endorsed the current "president" as did the Democratic Socialists of America. Also in October 2008, the speaker of the Iranian Parliament, Ari Larijani, endorsed the current US "president," saying he would meet face to face with leaders of Iran, North Korea, Venezuela, Syria and Cuba "without preconditions," and that he is more flexible and rational. In June 2012, the current US "president" was endorsed by Raul Castro's daughter, while she was in the US advocating for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender rights.
The US "president" has broken protocol of previous presidents by directly negotiating with a terrorist-sponsoring state, Iran--whose "president" is not elected; provided US assistance to terrorist organizations such as the Muslim Brotherhood and al Qaeda, and indirect support to the Islamic State. There is an old saying that "Birds of a feather, flock together." 'Sounds like these birds have been flocking together for longer than we knew. There is also a an ancient nugget of wisdom in 1 Corinthians 15:33, "Be not deceived: evil companions corrupt good morals." With the US "president," his administration and the company he keeps, one has to wonder who is corrupting who? And at what expense?
Obama still believes in a nuclear deal, although Iran is skittish - even against a military option - http://www.debka.com/article/24525/Obama-still-believes-in-a-nuclear-deal-although-Iran-is-skittish---even-against-a-military-option
In the last two days, the Obama administration has swung between conflicting signals on the Iranian nuclear deal. Unable to wave away the tough conditions laid down by Tehran, the US president was nonetheless optimistic about a final deal to curb Iran's nuclear program in comments he made at the Americas summit in Panama Sunday, April 12. Obama said he was not surprised at the way supreme leader Ali Khamenei had characterized the framework agreement, because "Iran has it own politics and hardliners who need to be satisfied, but there may be ways to structure the final nuclear deal that achieve core objectives while satisfying Iran's pride."
Just Saturday, US Defense Secretary Ashton Carter said: "We have the capability to shut down, set back and destroy the Iranian nuclear program." He referred to the Massive Ordinance Penetrator-MOP, aka the "bunker buster" which is capable of penetrating fortified facilities up to 200 feet underground. "My job is among other things to make sure that the so-called military option is on the table," he said.
Iranian media headlines screamed: "US Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter has threatened Tehran with war."
This is exactly what Khamenei was aiming for when on April 9, he laid down two implacable terms for a deal: the removal of sanctions on the day a final deal is signed and a firm refusal to allow international inspections of Iran's military sites.
Both of these provisions contradicted Washington's presentation of its core conditions for a comprehensive accord as being gradual sanctions relief and intrusive inspections.
One of Khamenei's objects was indeed to remove all suspicion on his home front that Iran's negotiators had given ground to the world powers either in the overt agreement or in any secret annexes.
The Iranian media headlines achieved this purpose.
But underlying the vocal exchanges between the two capitals is Iran's confidence that President Obama has discarded the option of military force against its nuclear sites. This confidence gave Tehran the edge in round after round of diplomacy with the US and the world powers.
Senior negotiator Foreign Minister Javad Zarif boasted on April 7, that Iran was "capable of producing an atomic bomb at any given moment," and was contained solely by "religious Islamic injunctions."
His boast was amply illustrated by the 20,000 centrifuges Iran had built up during the years of negotiations, plus thousands of advanced machines standing by to further accelerate uranium enrichment - even though its stockpile of 3.6 percent had soared to 10 tons - enough to build 4-6 nuclear bombs.
This edge further enabled the Iranians to bring the Arak heavy water plant capable of producing plutonium to its final stages of construction, without encountering a prohibition in Lausanne, any more than the Fordo enrichment site, stealthily installed some years ago, or its ballistic missile program were sentenced to be dismantled.
That Iran would continue to get away with its tactic of talking while enriching was borne out by Obama assurance Sunday that ways would be found "to structure the final nuclear deal that achieve core objectives while satisfying Iran's pride."
The negotiating tactics pursued by Secretary of State John Kerry in Lausanne and in the previous round in Geneva not only diluted America's military option but virtually took it off the table - not only for America but for everyone else, including Israel. To put it back, much more is needed than Ashton Carter's reference to the bunker-buster. To make it credible, the United States must rebuild its military presence in the Gulf and the Middle East - bringing back two aircraft carriers to reinforce the lone USS Carl Vinson, for starters.
This, however, would contradict the doctrine Obama expounded on April 2 when he said: "When you hear the inevitable critics of the deal sound off, ask them a simple question: Do you really think that this verifiable deal, if fully implemented and backed by the world's powers, is a worse option than the risk of another war in the Middle East?"
But he failed to explain the multiple versions of the Lausanne deal published in Washington, Tehran and latterly Paris, whose discrepancies can no longer be glossed over.
Speaking after his historic meeting with Cuba's Raul Castro Sunday, Obama rebuked Republican senators for pointing this out, accusing them of "partisanship which has crossed all boundaries."
Sen. John McCain shot back that discrepancies between US and Iranian versions of the deal extended to inspections, sanctions relief, and other key issues. ''It is undeniable that the version of the nuclear agreement outlined by the Obama administration is far different from the one described by Iran's supreme leader,'' he said.
This exchange took place two days before members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee plan to vote on Senator Bob Corker's bipartisan Iran nuclear agreement review act. This would give members of Congress 60 days after a nuclear deal is reached to decide if they want to waive sanctions against Iran.
But most of all it calls into question the Obama administration's presentation of a tentative set of disputed concepts reached in Lausanne as a finalized framework, which left just a few loose ends for resolving by the next deadline of June 30. The very real gaps have been highlighted and exploited by Tehran.
US tactics don't work well in the Persian bazaar, where the carpet seller pretends to be unwilling to sell his merchandise to an interested customer, while putting the price up in round after round of haggling.
Khamenei falls naturally into the role of the reluctant carpet seller when he is confronted with an especially keen American customer.
A bad deal with Iran is worse than war -
Salah al-Mukhtar, a Jordanian columnist who writes for the Amman News, wrote the following reaction to the framework agreement reached between Iran and the major powers over its disputed nuclear program:.
"This is a dangerous agreement, particularly for Saudi Arabia," Mr. al-Mukhtar wrote. "It provides Iran with what it needs most to pursue its wars and expansionism against the Arabs. Lifting the sanctions is America's way of backing the dangerous and direct wars against Arabs."
Meanwhile, Nasser Ahmed Bin Ghaith of the United Arab Emirates writes that "the United States surely does not want to see a more powerful Iranian hegemony in the region, but at the same time, it does not appear to mind some kind of Iranian influence in the region."
Finally, consider what Hassan al-Barari wrote in Qatar's paper "Al-Sharq":
"Iran has tried to intervene in Iraq, Lebanon and Syria and it is seeing that it's not paying any price; on the contrary, there are attempts by the big powers to reach understandings with Iran. There is also a feeling in Tehran that the U.S. is avoiding a military confrontation with the Iranians and their proxies. Any kind of appeasement with Iran will only lead it to ask for more and probably meddle in the internal affairs of the Arab countries and increase its arrogance."
It seems that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is not the only one concerned about Iran's apocalyptic plans. The entire area is very nervous about the true intent of the Iranians.
If Iran was the kind of international player who plays by the Queensbury Rules and elicited an aura of trust, such fears might be diminished. But that is not the case. Even as the discussions around Iran's nuclear capabilities have extended for years, Iran has it has directly or through its proxies taken over four Arab capitals, in Yemen, Syria, Libya and Lebanon.
As talks focused on limiting Iran's centrifuges, underground nuclear laboratories and uranium supplies, Iran has been allowed to extend its influence through powerful terrorist groups whose viciousness, mayhem and thirst for autocratic Islamist fundamentalist power knows no bounds.
And all this has happened while ISIS and its allies, such as Boko Haram in Nigeria, Al-Shabaab in Yemen, Al-Nusra and other extremists are charting their own paths of destruction and murder of innocent civilians, creating huge population changes as innocents are forced to flee to other countries that lack the resources to care for them.
To his credit, President Barack Obama does realize the threat Iran poses to the entire region, if not to the world. But how much has he sacrificed in order to secure this deal? In his words, it was either this agreement or another Middle East war.
But that is exactly what the Middle East is experiencing right now - and not just one war, but plenty of them, all being fought simultaneously. What Middle East war is the president afraid of that hasn't already brought the entire region to a state of chaos and hopelessness?
BE SURE TO CHECK OUT MY ALL NEW PROPHECY AND CREATION DESIGN WEBSITES. THERE IS A LOT TO SEE AND DO..........
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.