Dealing with Deceit - The  "Pre-Wrath" Deception - Bill Perkins -
www.compass.org   
Whenever  he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own nature, for he is a liar and the father  of lies. - John 8:44
I  get letters and phone calls...  
 One  of the few downsides to my job here at Compass is that pretty much weekly I have  someone new trying to convince me that the Rapture will somehow not happen at  the end of the Church Age, but rather, happen sometime during the seven-year  Tribulation period. 
I  get phone calls, letters, charts, tapes, books and videos all arguing the mid-,  post-trib or pre-wrath positions. These impassioned people are usually so  convinced their position is correct, and that my position is wrong, they think I  should spend hours on end listening to and debating them.
For  the record, I think the book "The Pre-wrath Rapture of the Church" has caused  the Body of Christ a great deal of pain and confusion. I think the author means  well, but the book promotes, in my opinion, heresy. 
I  feel badly for people deceived by this teaching because I too was once deceived  into believing the "pre-wrath" argument. When I was a new Believer in the 1970s,  I was taught by my well-meaning pastor that "mid-trib" Rapture was a fact, not a  theory. He gave all the same arguments I hear today, usually centered in some  shape, form or fashion around these two incorrect premises:
 >  "We're saved only from God's Wrath."
"Pre-wrathers"  believe that "God's Wrath" comes only in the last 3 1/2 years of the  tribulation--erroneously believing that the first 3 1/2 years are not actually  "God's Wrath." 
That  is, of course, ridiculous! The entire seven-year tribulation period is called  "The time of Jacob's Trouble." Good grief, in the first 3 1/2 years there's  world-wide economic collapse, famine and one-fourth of the earth dies... sure  sounds like "God's Wrath" to me! 
> "We need to prepare for the inevitable."
"Pre-wrathers  believe they should plan for the worst-case scenario because if they're wrong,  they conclude it won't matter. But if they're right, they'll be  prepared.
This  is a horrible way to live. Instead of living boldly for the Lord, knowing He is  coming to take us home, the pre-wrathers worry about the Antichrist coming!  
But,  in fact, if you live to see the Antichrist you've missed the  Rapture!
"And  you know what restrains him now, so that in his time he will be revealed. For  the mystery of lawlessness is already at work; only He who now restrains will do  so until he is taken out of the way (Via the Rapture). Then that lawless one  will be revealed..." 2Th. 2:6-8
One  of the cornerstones of Bible prophecy doctrine is that we're to keep our eyes  looking up to heaven, to our future home, not down on this earth. We are to look  for Jesus, not the Antichrist!
"Set  your mind on the things above, not on the things that are on earth."  Col  3:2
I  eventually moved on from my first church, which also tended to border on  legalism--common among pre-wrathers. And as I continued to read my Bible through  the years, the more I could not scripturally defend the mid-trib position, or  its close cousin, "pre-wrath." 
Noah  Knows
We've  shown many times in past articles that the Bible declares that the time before  the Rapture would be "JUST LIKE" the days before Noah's flood. "Just like"! And  then scripture lists the characteristics of that day that our day will be "just  like." It couldn't be any clearer.
 "For  the coming of the Son of Man will be just like the days of Noah. For as in those  days before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in  marriage, until the day that Noah entered the ark, and they did not understand  until the flood came and took them all away; so will the coming of the Son of  Man be." Matt. 24:37-39
Before  the flood it was "business as usual" with parties, food, building... until God  shut the door, which is the symbolic equivalent of the Rapture. This Biblical  truth has to be patently ignored by those holding to a "pre-wrath" position.  
To  accept "pre-wrath" you have to say the first 3 1/2 years of the 70th Week of  Daniel is no different than today. Really? 
In  the first 3 1/2 years of tribulation, Revelation 6 says the earth is in chaos,  the worldwide economy collapses and inflation is so rampant it takes a day's  wage just to buy food. Not to mention all this causes 1/4 of the earth to die  from war and wild beasts! Does that sound like Jesus' description of the Days of  Noah? Hardly!
The  Inerrant Word of God 
The  biggest problem with anything but pre-tribulational Rapture is that you have to  abandon using Biblical Dispensations to interpret scripture. This is the purest  of all doctrines because it's rooted in using a literal hermeneutic to interpret  scripture. 
It  seems like every day we get an email or call from someone who is confused about  how to apply a certain scripture. But once the basics of dispensational theology  is explained, they are no longer confused. Understanding and applying  dispensations when you study your Bible clears up so much. 
The  Bible is meant to be read literally, in context. Jesus took the Old Testament  literally when He talked about Adam and Eve, Noah's Ark and Jonah being  swallowed by the great fish. And all past prophecies were fulfilled literally,  not figuratively. Therefore we should also take the Bible literally, in context.  Applying dispensations gives us that context.
For  instance, the Bible says four times that the Millennial Reign of Christ on earth  lasts 1000 years (Rev 20:4-7). That doesn't mean the 1000 years is symbolic for  a "long period of time." It means what it says... it will last 1000 years. If  you try to make it symbolic for a long period time, you're injecting man's  sinfully tainted understanding into the interpretation.
The  Bible also says that in the millennium, the wolf and the lamb will lie in the  grass together. Things will change and there will be no carnivorous instincts of  animals (Isa. 11:6). This is another proof we're NOT in the millennium today!  Yet the official doctrines of the Presbyterian, Lutheran, Church of Christ and  Catholic denominations (and many others) promote that heresy. 
God  doesn't change, but He certainly does change how He deals with people through  the different ages or time periods throughout history.
You  can't argue that God didn't change through time how he dealt with people on the  earth because He did:
   1) before and after the fall of man; 
   2) before and after the Flood; 
   3) before and after the Tower of Babel; 
   4) before and after the Cross; 
   5) before and after the Rapture; 
   6) before and after the Second Coming; 
   7) before and after the Great White Throne Judgement.
Therefore  it is a FACT that God DOES change how He deals with people on the earth at  different times through the ages. Dividing the Bible into Biblical Dispensations  for context simply recognizes and applies this fact to scriptural  interpretation. And it clears up so many seemingly conflicting scriptures.  
Paul  refers to the current Church Age dispensation, as an "administration" and that  was hidden to the Jews, but now revealed:
"and  to bring to light what is the administration of the mystery which for ages has  been hidden in God who created all things;" Eph. 3:9
Properly  understanding and applying how God views these different time periods, literally  changed my life. Understanding dispensations allowed me to know when and where  to apply every verse of scripture. Without properly applying dispensations to  understand the context of what the Lord is saying in scripture, you're a ship  without a rudder.
"As  a result, we are no longer to be children, tossed here and there by waves and  carried about by every wind of doctrine, by the trickery of men, by craftiness  in deceitful scheming;" Eph. 4:14
I  taped a Bible study showing the absurdity of not properly applying dispensations  in your Bible study. I called it: Satan's Top 10 Lies: Lie #5, "Do everything  Jesus said to do." The point I was making was that it is IMPOSSIBLE to do  everything Jesus said to do in the Gospels. 
Properly  understood, Matthew, Mark, Luke and John are actually the end of the Old  Testament, not the beginning of the New Testament. They are an account of Jesus'  interaction with the Jews under the Law. 
The  Gospels are not specific instructions to those of us living in the Church Age.  Instructions to those living in the Church Age are given by Paul in the  Epistles. If you're interested, you can download that DVD for free CLICK HERE. 
I  challenge anyone who holds a "Pre-wrath" view of eschatology to find something  Biblically wrong with the Lie #5 Bible study. And if you can't, you have no  choice but to rethink your "pre-wrath" position. 
The  title alone, purporting you should NOT do everything Jesus says to do, raises  eyebrows because most people don't understand dispensations. They ASSUME we're  SUPPOSE to do what Jesus says to do in the Gospels. 
Millions  have worn bracelets that proclaim "WWJD" ... meaning that most of life's answers  can be found by applying "What Would Jesus Do" to all of life's  questions.
But  with a proper contextual view of the Gospels, it's easy to see Jesus was not  addressing those living in the Church Age, but rather, He was addressing Jews  under the Law in a prior dispensation. He spoke to them differently because they  did not have the discerning Spirit of God living in them.
The  "Church Age," the dispensation in which we live, only began after Jesus' death  and resurrection. It began when the Holy Spirit came to earth and it will end  when He leaves at the Rapture. Therefore the arrival and departure of the Holy  Spirit on the earth are the bookends of the Church Age dispensation.  
I  think it's better to think of the Gospels as being the end of the Old Testament  rather than the beginning of the New Testament. Only then can you fully  appreciate the the incredible Church Age characteristics. It's a special time on  God's timeline unlike any other. As Peter said:
"...just  as also our beloved brother Paul, according to the wisdom given him, wrote to  you, as also in all his letters, speaking in them of these things, in which are  some things hard to understand, which the untaught and unstable distort, as they  do also the rest of the Scriptures, to their own destruction. 2Pet.  3:15-16
One  key characteristic of dispensational theology is that the dispensational time  periods can't overlap. A dispensation, by definition, must end before the next  time dispensation can begin on God's calendar. 
But  the pre-wrath view has the Church Age crossing over into the Tribulation, into a  new dispensation. That's absurd! You can't have two dispensations going on  concurrently!!
But  the biggest downside to the "Pre-wrath" theory is that it robs Believers of the  joy and expectation of the coming Rapture. The end of the Church Age is  something to look forward to, not fear. We are to look for Jesus Christ, not the  Antichrist! 
"...  let us run with endurance the race that is set before us, fixing our eyes on  Jesus, the author and perfecter of faith..." Heb 12:1-2  
And  lastly, here's one more problem with pre-wrath that is laughable. The  "pre-wrath" Rapture view says that we, the Bride of Christ, will go through the  first 3 1/2 years of tribulation, meaning, we'll be severely persecuted before  our wedding day with the Lord.
Really?  Do you actually believe the Lord will unload on the Church, the Bride of Christ,  death and destruction, tearing us apart limb from limb, just before He marries  us? Oh good grief! Not much to look forward to there!
No,  we, the "Bride of Christ," are to look forward to our marriage to the God of  Love. 
"Let  us rejoice and be glad and give the glory to Him, for the marriage of the Lamb  has come and His bride has made herself ready." Rev. 19:7
These  are just a few of the problems with the "pre-wrath" theory. There are many  more--too many to write about.
BE SURE TO CHECK OUT MY ALL NEW PROPHECY AND CREATION DESIGN WEBSITES.  THERE IS A LOT TO SEE AND DO..........
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.