Questions that Confirm the Pretribulation Rapture, Part 1

Questions that Confirm the Pretribulation Rapture, Part 1 – Jonathan Brentner - https://www.jonathanbrentner.com/https/jonathan-brentner-g8fgsquarespacecom/config/2021/2/2/questions-that-confirm-the-pretribulation-rapture-part-1 You may wonder why I am again writing in defense of the pretribulation Rapture, the belief that Jesus will come for His church before the start of the seven-year tribulation.I am doing so because we live in a time when many inside and outside the church ridicule our hope in Jesus’ imminent appearing. How do we answer those who mock the hope we hold so dear? Additionally, because of the day in which we live, those of us who eagerly wait for our “blessed hope” need reminders of our excited expectation. Because we live in a worldriddled with fear, deception, and wickedness that continues to grow exponentially, it’s easy to take our eyes off of the prize before us. Despite my convictions, I sometimes find myself reviewing passages that speak to a pretribulation rapture as a way of restoring my soul, especially as I watch the comingMarxist New World Order take shape before my eyes. I suspect that you, like me, need periodic reassurance of the rock-solid biblical foundation that undergirds our hope in Jesus’ imminent appearing. In this two-part series, I will answer twelve questions that together confirm our belief that the New Testament indeed teaches a pretribulation Rapture. 1. IS PREMILLENNIALISM BIBLICAL? In any quest to establish the biblical soundness of the pretribulation Rapture, one must start with this question: is premillennialism biblical? If one denies the reality of a seven-year tribulation, as do the amillennialists, then it makes no difference where one places the Rapture since there is no future wrathfor us to avoid. What’s the point of one saying he or she believes in a posttribulation Rapture if they reject the biblical teaching of the literal seven-year tribulation? It’s pointless to make such a claim unless one believes that the judgments of Revelation6-18 are prophetic of a future time. Furthermore, those who tell us there is no real and tangible future time of tribulation as well as no distinct thousand-year reign of Jesus interpret biblical prophecy throughthe use of allegory. The arguments that support a pretribulation Rapture find their basis in what the writers of Scripture intended to communicate at the time they wrote; the path to establishing a pretribulational Rapture finds it basis in the words of theBible. So yes, we will begin with the assumption that Scripture prophesies a future time of wrath during a seven-year period of time after which Jesus returns to earth, destroysthe kingdom of the antichrist, and reigns over the nations of the earth for one thousand years seated on the throne of David in Jerusalem. For further reading on why premillennialism is biblical, I present my case for this in Israel’s Future Restoration Vindicates God’s Holiness and in 7 Reasons Why Premillennialismis a Biblical Necessity. If you reject premillennialism, you are welcome to keep reading with the understanding that all the points that follow assume a literal seven-year tribulation and thousand-year reign of Jesus. 2. ARE RAPTURE AND THE SECOND COMING THE SAME EVENT? Proceeding on the basis that premillennialism is a biblical necessity, we come to the next question in our quest: are the Rapture and Second Coming the same event? If suchis the case, this would place the Lord’s appearing for us at the end of the seven years of tribulation and thus end our journey (as do some premillennialists). However, the biblical descriptions of the Rapture and Second Coming differ significantly in many ways that render it impossible to reconcile the two into one event. Theycannot occur at the same time. The timing of the resurrection of those who have died in Christ confirms this distinction. The resurrection of the dead happens first in the order of events that Paul describesin 1 Thessalonians 4:13-17 and in 1 Corinthians 15:50-54. With the Second Coming, the resurrection of tribulation saints does not happen until after a lengthy sequence of many other events (see Rev. 19:11-20:4); it may not even occur until several days afterJesus’ begins His return to the earth. Please also note that the resurrection of the dead in Revelation 20:4 includes only a subset of believers, the tribulation saints, while the passages referring to the Raptureteach the Jesus raises all the dead in Christ. This not only distinguishes the two events, but necessitates a significant time lapse between them for people to come to Christ and experience martyrdom. These are just two of several key differences that exist in the passages describing the Rapture versus those referring to the Second Coming. If the words of Scripture matter,and they do, we cannot combine these two events into one occurrence. 3. WHAT IS THE NEW TESTAMENT EXPECTATION OF JESUS’ APPEARING? Now that we have established that the Rapture and Second Coming cannot be the same event, the next task is to explore the separation of time that must exist between thetwo. We begin this task by asking: Does the New Testament speak of Jesus’ appearing as imminent or one that happens after or during the events of the tribulation? The New Testament saints watched for the Rapture as though it could occur at any moment. The apostles repeatedly described their readers as eagerly anticipating Jesus’ returnfor them (1 Cor. 1:7; 1 Thess. 1:8-10; Titus 2:11-13; James 5:8; 1 Peter 1:13). They regarded Jesus’ future appearing as imminent, one that could happen at any moment. In Philippians 3:20-21 Paul wrote, “But our citizenship is in heaven, and from it we await a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ, who will transform our lowly body to be likehis glorious body, by the power that enables him to subject all things to himself.” The Greek word for “await” in verse 20 points to an “intense anticipation” or an “excited expectation” of a future event.[i] This is the word usage we would expect if the Rapturecould occur at any time, even in the lifetime of the New Testament saints. As for the Second Coming, Jesus told us that at least two major events would happen before it occurred. In Matthew 24:15-29, He says that the defilement of the temple bythe antichrist and the “great tribulation” that follows it will happen before He returns to earth. According to the Lord’s own words, significant events that have not yet happened must take place before the Second Coming. It cannot be an imminent event suchas the apostles wrote about the Rapture. The sense of imminency not only confirms that a significant of time passes between the Rapture and Second Coming, but also places it ahead of the events that the Bible sayswill occur during the tribulation. 4. IS THERE AN EXAMPLE OF SUCH AN IMMINENT EXPECTATION IN THE NEW TESTAMENT? Having noted the excited anticipation of Jesus’ imminent appearing that Paul wrote about in Philippians 3:20-21, we come to our next question: does the New Testament providean example of such an expectation? Yes, it does. A close look at 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18 reveals the recipients of Paul’s letter not only believed that the rapture could happen in their lifetime, but mistakenlyassumed that it would happen before they died. We see this in the way that Paul addresses the unnecessary grieving of the new converts in Thessalonica over the deaths of some in their midst. If their sorrow had stemmed from a lack of belief in the future resurrection of their loved ones, Paul would have responded in the same way that he addressed this issuewith those in Corinth (1 Cor. 15), but he does not do that. Instead, he attributes their grief to a lack of information rather than a lack of belief in the resurrection. In response, the apostle gives them further revelation regarding the rapture (4:13-16). Paul’s emphasis in these verses reveals the source of the problem: the Thessalonians mistakenly thought that the dead in Christ would miss out on the joy of the Rapture.So, in response to their grief, the apostle stresses the prominent role of the dead in Christ during Jesus’ appearing (4:13-16). Why would he reply in such a way if this were not the cause of their unnecessary mourning? In Paul’s early letters, he expressed the belief the Rapture might occur in his lifetime (see 1 Cor. 15:51; 1 Thess. 4:17) and it’s more than likely he expressed this anticipationwhile in Thessalonica. His new converts in the city simply mimicked his anticipation that the Rapture would happen in their lifetime. 5. DOES THE IMMINENCY OF JESUS’ APPEARING SIGNIFY THAT WE WILL MISS ALL OF THE TRIBULATION? For me, the answers to the previous questions confirm that the Rapture will happen before the start of the seven-year tribulation, but this is not the case with many pastorsand believers. I remember hearing a sermon during which the preacher combined the Rapture and Second Coming. Then at the end of his message he cautioned that the Lord could return that very afternoon. I did not understand how that was possible since so manyevents have yet to occur before Jesus returns to earth. Such misunderstandings necessitate that we dig deeper in order to establish that our imminent anticipation of the Rapture signifies that we will miss all of the rapture. We will begin by examining 1 Thessalonians 5:2-3 where Paul tells his readers that the start of the day of the Lord will surprise people on the earth “like a thief in thenight” with its “sudden destruction” from which “they will not escape.” The day of Lord, a primarily Old Testament term, refers to an extended time of the Lord’s wrath on the earth leading up to and including Jesus’ return to the earth. The phrase also includesHis millennial reign on the earth. Because John wrote the book of Revelation forty years later, the apostle did not have it as a reference point, but we do. We can compare what Paul wrote about the day ofthe Lord, based on his Old Testament understanding of it, to the judgments in Revelation. If this coming time of wrath arrives as a surprise to people on the earth and occurs at a time when people are saying “There is peace and safety” (1 Thess. 5:3), we mustask, “When might such a surprise occur in this list of judgments that John writes about in Revelation 6-18?” If the day of the Lord were to begin at any time after the seal judgments of Revelation 6 commence, the start of this day could not possibly catch anyone by surprise withits “sudden destruction.” Furthermore, no one will be saying “peace and security” (v. 3) during and after the pestilences, famines, pandemics, and wars of the seal judgments kill one-fourth of the earth’s population at that time, well over two billion people. In 1 Thessalonians 5:9-10 we read Paul’s assurance that we as believers will miss the onset of the day of the Lord upon the earth, “For God has not destined us for wrath,but to obtain salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ, who died for us that whether we are awake of asleep we might live with him.” Based on the context, this wrath is that of the day of the Lord, not hell. Our deliverance from the start of this day is thatof the Rapture, which Paul describes in 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18. 6. DID THE THESSALONIANS BELIEVE THEY WOULD MISS THE TRIBULATION? Thanks to some troublemakers that told the saints in Thessalonica that the day of the Lord had already begun, we know these new converts expected the Rapture to happen beforethe start of the day of the Lord wrath on the earth, the day that includes all of the tribulation. Paul’s response to the errant message confirms that the Thessalonians believed the Rapture would occur before its start. In 2 Thessalonians 2:2, Paul tells them “not to be quickly shaken in mind or alarmed, either by a spirit or a spoken word, or a letter seeming to be from us, to the effectthat the day of the Lord has come.” The words in this verse imply that the Thessalonians literally trembled with fear because of the report that this day had already begun. The response of these new converts to this news tells us several things: First, why would they panic at hearing such news if they expected to be on earth during the day of the Lord or even for a part of it? Their frightened response to the falsereport tells us they regarded Paul’s promise in 1 Thessalonians 5:9 as one of deliverance from God’s wrath; they clearly did not expect to be on the earth at the beginning of the day of the Lord. Otherwise, they would have expected such news and regarded itas a sign that Jesus’ appearing was that much closer. Second, the trepidation of the Thessalonians regarding the start of the day of the Lord tells us they expected this time to especially brutal in terms of affliction anddestruction. At the time, they were experiencing intense persecution at the hands of the Jews. Even with such opposition, these suffering saints trembled with fear in response to the news that the day of the Lord had begun. Third, if the Thessalonians had misunderstood Paul’s promise of deliverance from the wrath of the day of the Lord in 1 Thessalonians 5:9, this was his chance to set therecord straight by telling them that although this day had not yet started, they could expect to see a part or even all of its judgments. But the apostle does not do that! Instead, the apostle assures the Thessalonians that they will not be on earth during the start of the day of the Lord, which for us signifies that we will miss all the seal,trumpet, and bowl judgment of Revelation 6-18. “How does he do that?” you might ask. The answer to first question in Part 2 of this series answers this question. In 2 Thessalonians 2:3, Paul assures his readers thatthey will not be earthbound at the time that the day of the Lord begins. VISIT: PROPHECY WATCHER WEEKLY NEWS: HTTP://PROPHECY-WATCHER-WEEKLY-NEWS.BLOGSPOT.COM