WHO Using Heathcare as Trojan Horse to Global Digital ID

 WHO Using Heathcare as Trojan Horse to Global Digital ID – DanHart - https://www.prophecynewswatch.com/article.cfm?recent_news_id=6149 On Monday, the World Health Organization (WHO) announced the launch of a "digital COVID-19 certification" system modeled after the European Union's digital certification network.While the WHO claims that the purpose of the system is to allow people to "receive quality health services quickly and more effectively," experts say the initiative is a disguised power grab akin to a vaccine passport -- designed to be used as an enforcementmechanism for global control. The WHO announced the new certification system in the wake of its annual 10-day World Health Assembly in Geneva, Switzerland, in which a global pandemic treaty and amendmentsto international health rules were voted on by the 194 WHO member countries. The final merged agreement, which former Congresswoman Michele Bachmann characterized as "a platform for global governance through health care," will likely be finalized next year. But as Bachmann pointed out during Wednesday's edition of "Washington Watch with Tony Perkins," the WHO's adoption of the new COVID certification system was not voted on. "It was discussed prior to the meeting that we just had for seven days in Geneva, but they did not vote on it," she explained. "I was stunned. ... This is the most unbelievablepower grab, because this digital certification will ultimately be used as the enforcement mechanism for this global control over all nations regarding health care and many other issues as well." Bachmann went on to describe the extent of the ramifications that could result from a digital certification system controlled by the WHO. "It's a global digital ID," she observed. "Take a look at your cell phone. A QR code would be on this, only it's managed by the World Health Organization, the organizationthat tragically got it more wrong than any other nation during the global pandemic. But now they would be the ones who are in charge of administering this QR code. ...They would also set the requirements that we have to meet, whether it's mandating vaccines,mandating boosters, mandating mask wearing, mandating lockdowns, mandating church closures. ... And our cell phone would tell the story if we are in compliance or not." Bachmann further noted that the certification network may turn out to resemble other highly controversial digital tracking systems used by dictatorial regimes. "It's very similar to the social credit system that communist China uses and imposes on their own people," she argued. "That's what this system envisions. And it's far morethan just the vaccine. Ultimately, they envision a cashless society where money would be converged. ... It's also a travel locator number that we have. We could not get on a plane or a public conveyance of any kind unless we are in conformity with what theWHO says." Bachmann emphasized that the magnitude of the threat to civil liberties should prompt decisive action on the part of Congress. "The biggest question is, will the United States of America go into this system? And if so, when? That's why I say it's time for U.S. senators to wake up and start askingquestions, as well as members of the House. They need to deliver the message in no uncertain terms to the Biden administration. The United States will not go into this system. United States-based corporations will not go into this system, and no customer ofany business should ever be punished for not going into this system. ... Once you give away sovereignty, it's almost impossible to give back." Perkins concurred, highlighting the importance of America's Constitution in ensuring the rights of its citizens. "This is why we have no business being in these global entities,because ... we're unique. We have a Bill of Rights. We understand the value of the individual and the God-given rights that we have. They don't come to us from government. They're granted to us. They're given to us by God to be protected by government. That's what makes us different and that's what theseother governments don't have, and that's why their people don't have freedom. And we're willing to fight for that freedom." ------------------------------------------ UN's Vision of The Future: One Digital ID To Rule Us All � JacobNordangard - https://www.prophecynewswatch.com/article.cfm?recent_news_id=6154 The United Nations recently published three new Policy Briefs "to provide more detail on certain proposals contained in Our Common Agenda" - The UN Secretary-General's visionfor the future of global cooperation that will be decided at "The Summit of the Future" in September 2024. These briefings; A Global Digital Compact, Reforms to the International Financial Architecture and The Future of Outer Space Governance sets out a chillingcourse for our future. Among the proposals are a new "apex body" in charge of the entire financial system that will "enhance its coherence and align its priorities with the 2030 Agenda for SustainableDevelopment." This could, according to Secretary-General Ant�nio Guterres, be done through a "Biennial Summit between the Group of 20, Economic and Social Council, the Secretary-General, and heads of international financial institutions." This will further integrate the G20 with the United Nations into a body that can be described as an economic Security Council. It also seems like a perfect nest for the "apexpredators" that runs the international banking system. A vital part of the agenda is also digital connectivity and the establishment of a Global Digital Compact. This can be described as a cybernetic organ, consisting of a digitallyconnected network of people, entities, devices, and things, that easily can be directed by those who run the system. In the Policy Brief it is for example explained how digitisation will help to achieve the global goals. The suggestions happens to be very similar to what World Economic Forumand PwC prescribed in their report Unlocking Technologies for the Global Goals in 2020. A Digital ID is a cornerstone in this work and is among other things seen as a way to reduce poverty. This may, however, come at a cost. In the UN Secretary-General's High-level Panel on Digital Cooperations report Age of Digital Interdependence from 2019, it is stated that: A digital ID can help unlock new opportunities but can also introduce new risks and challenges. They can be used to undermine human rights - for example, by enabling civilsociety to be targeted, or selected groups to be excluded from social benefits. Will you get your social protection coverage if you don't comply with vaccinations or other measures introduced to achieve the SDGs? Probably not. This can later be fusedwith a social credit system and Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) - which is now being introduced and tested in many countries across the world. To receive your daily bread you have to obey and accept the instructions from the Masters that run the show. If the UN declares a "Planetary Emergency" this will have severeconsequences for our freedoms (as we experienced during the pandemic). In the Policy Brief - A Global Digital Compact the authors truthfully are mentioning the rising inequality after the pandemic. Digital technologies are accelerating the concentration of economic power in an ever smaller group of elites and companies: the combined wealth of technology billionaires,$2.1 trillion in 2022, is greater than the annual gross domestic product of more than half of the Group of 20 economies. But it seems that United Nations has a somewhat peculiar way of solving this problem. Not only do they strive towards digitising everything - they have also partnered withBig Tech in order to achieve this. The UN Secretary-General's High-level Panel on Digital Cooperation was led by Melinda Gates from Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (according to the bio, Melinda "helped developmany of the company's multimedia products" during her time at Microsoft) and tech billionaire Jack Ma from the Chinese Ali Baba Group. This comes with assistance from Young Global Leaders like Mohammed Al Gergawi (chairman of the high-tech Mecca gathering - World Government Summit in Dubai), and Marina Kolesnik(Russia/Ukraine) as well as a "generous" contribution from the World Economic Forums Center for the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Ali Baba developed Chinas Social Credit System through their subsidiary Ant Group whereas Microsoft promotes Digital ID in the ID2020 Alliance together with GAVI - The VacccineAlliance and the ever so present Rockefeller Foundation. United Nations seems to have hired a gang of robbers to manage the bank. These are the "trustees of the material universe for future generations" as stated in the global businesselites' Davos Manifesto from 1973. Why on Earth would these "enlightened custodians" reverse a development that has put more power and wealth into their hands? And now our "generous" tech billionaires are heading for Outer Space. The last Policy Brief (The Future of Outer Space Governance) formulates the grand vision to reestablisha presence on the moon with a way station (Lunar Gateway) and the development of a base at the south pole of the Moon as well as conducting a manned mission to the red planet (Elon Musk's SpaceX). These are old fantasies from the late 1940s that never seem to materialise. But their "space-based opportunities" also highlight the "important link between outer space andthe 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development" with the importance of satellite surveillance to "track deforestation, monitor protected areas for illegal poaching and fishing and assess biodiversity changes" as well as track our every move through the globalnavigation satellite systems. As WEF-trustee and Climate Prophet/Profiteer Al Gore proclaimed with a giggle in the commercial for his satellite surveillance project Climate Trace: "And most importantly...NO MORE HIDING". Are these people insane? How can the construction of a digital world brain really contribute to a greener and healthier planet? Wouldn't it be a more efficient measure to secure peace and the environment on this planet if this megalomaniac elite were sent on a one way mission to Mars? -------------------------------------