A law for the Clintons, another for us - Bill Wilson - www.dailyjot.com
Attorney General Loretta Lynch, fresh off a private meeting with former President Bill Clinton on an airport tarmac, has closed the case against Hillary Clinton with no criminal charges. The concept of rule by law was undermined by true Democracy. Democracy is a system governed by the majority or by the mighty rather than a system of set laws, like a Republic. The privileged prevailed. FBI Director James Comey pronounced his own law when he said that "our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case." Here we have unelected political appointees admitting there are legal violations, but making an independent determination to close the case rather than let the legal system play out.
The Founding Fathers chose a Constitutional Republic as the governmental system because they wanted the rule of law in our nation. They wanted one law for all so that the rich, the mighty, the despot would not be able to escape justice; so that the poor, the weak, the lessor in society would have the same justice as all citizens. A democracy opens the door for the very chicanery we have seen with the Clinton case-two sets of law--One for the Clinton's and one for everybody else. The current Administration, as documented by Bloomberg, has prosecuted a record number of people for playing loose with classified information. Not Hillary Clinton. Not even a trial, just an administrative dismissal of the case.
Cornell University Law School has posted on its website "18.U.S. Code & 793-Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information." This law enumerates the many ways that anyone who willingly shares defense related information or knowingly loses it "Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both." This is likely just one such law that Hillary Clinton should have been brought up on trial. There are many, many more. But there are two sets of laws in this nation, especially highlighted by the "progressive" [sic Marxist Islamist] regime now in power-one for common folk like us who are harassed by the enforcer everyday, and one set for members of the exclusive public service echelon.
The Biblical principle behind the rule of law is God's way to hold society accountable and provide individual protections. Moses established a system of courts to hear the people's grievances and judge them according to God's laws, which does not change. Democracy, in its purest form, allows the law to be a moving target, changing with the whims of the people or those in charge of the people. This is how we have arrived at such a spot in our justice system. The beauty of the American Republic was that people were not above the law. As in this case where the FBI said Clinton did not intend to break the law, Numbers 15:29 says, "You shall have one law for him that sins through ignorance, both for the children of Israel and for the stranger that sojourns among them." Thus, the saying, "ignorance is no excuse for the law." Except for the Clintons.
Who shall demand justice? - Bill Wilson - www.dailyjot.com
Pay no mind to the man behind the curtain. There is nothing to see. It took only eight days after Attorney General Loretta Lynch met with former President Bill Clinton for the FBI to decide against indicting Hillary Clinton even though she may have broken several laws. The FBI reports to Lynch under the Justice Department. Of course, Lynch told reporters that the 30-minute meeting between her and the first-man wannabe was by "chance" and that "There was no discussion on any matter pending before the department or any matter pending with any other body. There was no discussion of Benghazi, no discussion of State Department emails." So America is supposed to believe the FBI squish is coincidence?
FBI Director James Comey told reporters "Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information...we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton's personal e-mail account...Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case."What else would one expect of an FBI Director who was hand-picked by the current "president"?
While there is evidence that a crime has been committed, there was extreme carelessness with top-secret documents important to national security, and it is possible that enemies of America gained access to this information, Clinton is off the hook because she didn't intend to commit the crime. This "no intent, no harm, no crime" concept would never fly with any law enforcement officer or unconstitutional government agency investigating folks like you and me. Tell it to the IRS agent auditing your restaurant receipt or the police officer stopping you for going 38 in a 30 mph zone. No, this is a travesty. This regime of corrupt cronies is creating a class of untouchables who are above the law.
On one hand Comey says, "To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences." On the other hand, he says, "Only facts matter, and the FBI found them here in an entirely apolitical and professional way. I couldn't be prouder to be part of this organization." This is duplicitous double talk. In any other case where such evidence and suspicion were present, the FBI would eagerly prosecute to the fullest. The Bill Clinton-Loretta Lynch-James Comey political connections bought a stay out of jail pass. As in Isaiah 59:4, "None call for justice, nor any plead for truth: they trust in vanity, and speak lies; they conceive mischief, and bring forth iniquity." Who shall demand justice?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.