Search This Blog

Friday, March 12, 2021

WORLD AT WAR: 3.13.21 - 9 Signs That Chess Pieces Are Being Moved Into Place For A Major War In The Middle East

9 Signs That Chess Pieces Are Being Moved Into Place For A Major War In The Middle East- by Michael Snyder - http://endoftheamericandream.com/9-signs-that-chess-pieces-are-being-moved-into-place-for-a-major-war-in-the-middle-east/ The American people are really going to regret putting the warmongers back in control. Joe Biden has been in the White House for less than two months, and the warmongersthat Biden has surrounded himself with have been feverishly setting the stage for the next war in the Middle East. I do not believe that it will start within the next week, but I do believe that it is inevitable. While President Trump was in the White Housefor four years, the U.S. didn’t start any new conflicts, but now the Biden administration is quite determined to start projecting “American influence” all over the globe once again. Most Americans don’t understand the bigger picture, but the truth is thatthis is going to have very serious implications over the next few years. In this article, I would like to examine some of the chess moves that have been made since Joe Biden entered the White House. As you will see, a very troubling picture emergesonce you start putting all of the pieces together. #1 Literally one day after Biden was inaugurated, a massiveU.S. military convoy rolled into Syria… A large US military convoy entered northeastern Syria on Thursday, Syrian state news agency SANA reports, citing sources on the ground. According to the report, the convoy included some 40 trucks and armored vehicles and was backed from the air by helicopters. President Trump had tried very hard to disengage from the war in Syria, but Biden has made it crystal clear that the U.S. will be heavily involved in that conflict movingforward. #2 Just a few weeks later, Joe Biden conducted his first airstrikeagainst Iranian-backed forces inside Syria… The US has carried out an air strike targeting Iran-backed militias in Syria, in the first military action undertaken by the Biden administration. The Pentagon said the strike destroyed “multiple facilities” and was ordered in response to attacks against US and coalition personnel in Iraq. Militia officials said one person had been killed but a war monitor reported at least 22 fatalities. #3 Of course it was inevitable that Iranian-backed forces wouldrespond, and they retaliated by launching rockets at a military base in Iraq where U.S. forces are stationed. Just a couple days ago, new Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin said that there will be a U.S. military response “at a time and place of our own choosing”… Defense Sec. Lloyd Austin tells @MarthaRaddatz the U.S. is still assessing who carried out recent rocket attack on base in Iraq housing U.S. troops—and that if the U.S.decides to respond, it will be “at a time and place of our own choosing.” #4 More U.S. airstrikes may come sooner rather than later. Infact, it is being reported that the U.S. has just sent six B-52 bombers to Diego Garcia… The U.S. Air Force is sending six B-52 Stratofortress bombers to Diego Garcia, a military hub that acts as a strategic location for operations in both the Middle East andthe Pacific. Citing a U.S. official, CNN on Monday reported that the Cold War-era bomber will be “available for operations against Iran if ordered.” #5 The Biden administration is also sending approximately 10,000more U.S. troops to the Middle East… Once the amphibious assault ship Bataan, which is moving toward the Middle East, arrives, the U.S. will have added roughly 10,000 personnel to the area within the last week,according to The Wall Street Journal. #6 Russia has been busy making moves in the region as well. OnFriday, Russia conducted an air strike on an oil-loading facility in Syria that is used by opposition forces that are backed by Turkey, Saudi Arabia and the Biden administration… A suspected missile strike on an oil-loading facility used by Turkey-backed opposition forces in northern Syria sparked a massive blaze across a large area where oil tankersare normally parked, aerial and satellite images show. Syrian opposition groups and at least one war monitor blamed Russia for the strike Friday night near the towns of Jarablus and al-Bab, near the border with Turkey. In areport, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, based in Britain, said Russian warships in the Mediterranean had fired three missiles that struck primitive oil refineries and tanker trucks in the region. #7 Meanwhile, Israel continues to hit strategically importanttargets inside Syria on a regular basis. The following comes from a news report that was published in late February… Syrian air defenses were activated in the capital Damascus and its southern suburbs Sunday night to repel an Israeli missile attack, state media reported. There was no wordon casualties. State TV quoted an unnamed military official as saying that most of the Israeli missiles were shot down before reaching their targets near Damascus. #8 Israel is particularly interested in keeping Iran from developingnuclear weapons. In an interview with Fox News, Israeli Defense Minister Benny Gantz just stated that Israel is ready to attack Iran without any U.S. help… The Israeli military is updating plans to strike Iranian nuclear sites and is prepared to act independently, Israeli Defense Minister Benny Gantz told Fox News. Israel has identified numerous targets inside Iran that would hurt its ability to develop a nuclear bomb. “If the world stops them before, it’s very much good. But if not, we must stand independently and we must defend ourselves by ourselves,” Gantz said in his first sit-downinterview with an American outlet. #9 During a phone call last Thursday between Kamala Harris andBenjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli Prime Minister made it exceedingly clear that his nation is ready to do whatever it takes to prevent the Iranians from developing their own nukes… “The prime minister said we would continue to strengthen our intelligence and security cooperation and said during their conversation that as prime minister of Israel, heis totally committed to preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons that are meant for our destruction.” Of course the Iranians have no plans to back down, and that makes a military conflict between Israel and Iran inevitable. There will be war in the Middle East, and the horror of that conflict will shock the entire planet. And once that war begins, it will greatly accelerate our economic problems and the ongoing political turmoil in this country. So enjoy this brief period of relative stability while you can, because our world is about to start changing in dramatic ways. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Mullahs' Nuclear Weapons Game- by Majid Rafizadeh - https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/17129/iran-nuclear-weapon-game If the Western leaders know anything about the theocratic establishment of Iran, they would be able to see that the regime has used the Shia religion of Islam to justifyrepressing its population, killing, executing and sponsoring terror groups across the region. So, what would stop the mullahs from issuing a fake religious ruling if it is going to advance their nuclear program by concealing the fact that they want both nuclear weaponsand ensuring the survival of their theocracy? "The government is empowered unilaterally to revoke any Shahri'ah agreements which it has concluded with the people when these agreements are contrary to the interest ofthe country or Islam." � Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, quoted in "Iran: The Formation of Trans Identity and Possible Paths Toward the Acceptance of Greater Gender 'Deviance'", Berkeley Journal of Middle Eastern & Islamic Law [Vol. 9:1]. The important issue for the ruling mullahs of Iran is the survival of their dictatorship. Anything, including religion, can be used to ensure that. The important issue for the ruling mullahs of Iran is the survival of their dictatorship. Anything, including religion, can be used to ensure that. So, what would stop themullahs from issuing a fake religious ruling if it is going to advance their nuclear program by concealing the fact that they want both nuclear weapons and ensuring the survival of their theocracy? Pictured: Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei (left)and President Hassan Rouhani. (Image source: khamenei.ir) The Iranian regime has acknowledged for the first time that it might pursue openly obtaining nuclear weapons. The Iranian Intelligence Minister Mahmoud Alavi, a close advisor to the Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, pointed out recently that Iran might in fact very likely pursuethat path: "I must make it clear that if a cat is pushed into the corner, it may behave differently from a cat that walks freely. If Iran is pushed into a corner, it will not be itsfault [i.e. the pursuit of nuclear weapons] but rather the fault of those pushing it." This statement is critical. The Iranian leaders have long argued that there is no way they can seek nuclear weapons due to a religious fatwa (legal opinion under Islamiclaw) issued by Khamenei. Khamenei did indeed previously issue a fatwa forbidding the pursuit of nuclear weapons. He has been previously quoted as saying: "We consider the use of such weapons as haraam [religiously forbidden under Islamic law] and believe that it is everyone's duty to make efforts to secure humanity againstthis great disaster". Khamenei also stated that the production or use of nuclear weapons are governed by Islamic laws which supposedly ban them. On his official website, he adds that "Both sharia[Islamic laws] and aqli [related to logic and reason] fatwas dictate that we do not pursue them." This fatwa of banning nuclear weapons has been the Iranian regime's ready answer on international stage to prove that their nuclear program is solely for peaceful purposes.When Iran's Foreign Minister Javad Zarif met with US Senator Rand Paul, in 2019, for example, Zarif told Paul about Iran's unwillingness to seek nuclear weapons precisely because of Khamenei's fatwa. Other world leaders have also used the Supreme Leader's fatwa to buttress Iran's claim that it does not want a nuclear bomb. President Barack Obama, for instance, in anattempt to reach a nuclear deal and appease the mullahs, declared in his address to the U.N. General Assembly in 2013 that "The Supreme Leader has issued a fatwa against the development of nuclear weapons." Former US Secretary of State John Kerry supported the mullahs' line by calling the fatwa "the Highest form of Islamic prohibition": "The supreme leader... says he has issued a fatwa, the highest form of Islamic prohibition against some activity, and he said that is to prohibit Iran from ever seekinga nuclear weapon." Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton also lent her support by further pushing the narrative of the Iranian regime. According to her: "The other interesting development which you may have followed was the repetition by the Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei that they would � that he had issued a fatwa againstnuclear weapons, against weapons of mass destruction. Prime Minister Erdogan and I discussed this at some length, and I've discussed with a number of experts and religious scholars." If the Western leaders know anything about the theocratic establishment of Iran, they would be able to see that the regime has used the religion of Shia Islam to justifyrepressing Iran's population, killing, executing and sponsoring terror groups across the region. So, what would stop the mullahs from issuing a fake religious ruling if it is going to advance their nuclear program by concealing the fact that they want bothnuclear weapons and ensuring the survival of their theocracy? Secondly, if the Western leaders know anything about Shia Islam, they would realize that a fatwa can be changed at any time. Third, if the Western leaders know anythingabout the Islamic Republic of Iran, they would realize that the Iranian leaders have drafted the Islamic Republic's constitution in a way that allows the government to pass laws prioritizing those codified laws over religious rulings and fatwas. Accordingto Article 167, "the judge is bound to endeavor to judge each case on the basis of the codified law [passed by the parliament and endorsed by the Guardian Council]." Then it adds, "In case of the absence of any such law, he has to deliver his judgment on thebasis of authoritative Islamic sources and authentic fatwa." Simply put, the Iranian parliament can immediately pass a law allowing the government to pursue nuclear weapons. According to the Iranian constitution, such a codified lawwould override any fatwa that banned a nuclear program. Even the Islamic Republic's founding father, the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, mentioned on several occasions that Islamic laws could, if necessary, be ignored . He pointedout, for example, that "the government is empowered unilaterally to revoke any Shahri'ah agreements which it has concluded with the people when these agreements are contrary to the interest of the country or Islam." On another occasion, Khomeini stated that "the government can prevent the hajj, which is one of the important divine obligations, on a temporary basis, in cases when itis contrary to the interests of the Islamic country." The important issue for the ruling mullahs of Iran is the survival of their dictatorship. Anything, including religion, can be used to ensure that. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Let�s Compare The U.S. Military To The Russian Military And The Chinese Military� - by Michael Snyder - http://endoftheamericandream.com/lets-compare-the-u-s-military-to-the-russian-military-and-the-chinese-military/ A couple decades ago, the U.S. military was an unparalleled fighting machine. Both Russia and China seemed hopelessly behind, and nobody dared to challenge America�s militarysuperiority. Everyone else was battling for second place in the pecking order, and they knew it. But since that time, Russia and China have engaged in extremely aggressive modernization programs, while the U.S. military has chosen to focus on becoming more �diverse� and �inclusive�. As a result, the balance of power has changed dramatically. In this article, I would like to focus on a few examples that demonstrate the shift that has taken place. For instance, the Russians are extremely excited about their new ultra-quiet Borei-class submarines that can rain death and destruction down upon their enemies from thousandsof miles away� Each of the submarine�s sixteen R-30 Bulava (�Mace�) missiles typically carries six 150-kiloton nuclear warheads designed to split apart to hit separate targets. This meansone Borei can rain seventy-two nuclear warheads ten times more destructive than the bomb dropped on Hiroshima on cities and military bases over 5,800 miles away. The Borei is the most advanced SSBN in the Russian Navy, and is designed to replace its seven Soviet-era Delta-class SSBNs. In China, scientists have been feverishly working to develop fearsome biologically-enhanced �super soldiers� that could potentially be far superior to standard western soldiersin a future war� U.S. intelligence shows that China has conducted �human testing� on members of the People�s Liberation Army in hope of developing soldiers with �biologically enhanced capabilities,� the top U.S. intelligence official said Friday. John Ratcliffe, the director of national intelligence, included the explosive claim in a long Wall Street Journal op-ed in which he made the case that China poses the pre-eminentnational security threat to the U.S. Meanwhile, Joe Biden says that the U.S. military is �making good progress� on feminist issues. Some of the current priorities include �creating maternity flight suits� andloosening hairstyle requirements� You know, some of � some of it is relatively straightforward work where we�re making good progress designing body armor that fits women properly; tailoring combat uniformsfor women; creating maternity flight suits; updating � updating requirements for their hairstyles. Of course any of the old-timers that dare to object to the new �woke military� are being purged, and so soon their won�t be any dissenting voices standing in the way ofthe social justice reforms that the Biden administration wishes to implement. Over in Russia, �diversity� is not a military priority. Instead, they are getting ready to introduce the new Sarmat intercontinental nuclear missiles into service. Thesenew missiles can travel at speeds of up to 15,000 mph, and a single missile has enough firepower to �wipe out Texas�� RUSSIA is poised to test an �unstoppable� 15,000 mph nuclear missile it boasts can beat any defense and wipe out Texas. The RS-28 Sarmat doomsday rocket is now primed to replace the much-feared R-36 � once dubbed the �Satan� nuke by Nato. The Kremlin brags it has a range of around 6,200 miles, can carry 16 warheads and is able to dodge any missile defense system. At the same time, the Chinese are rapidly developing highly advanced missile delivery systems that look just like �standard international shipping containers�� This missile would be a land-attack variant of an advanced anti-ship missile that would be deployed in launchers appearing to be standard international shipping containersfrom the outside. Such containers are being used all around the world for moving millions of tons of goods, and are often placed on the deck of large freighters. The YJ-18C is China�s version of the Club-K cruise missile built by Russia that also uses a launcher disguised as a shipping container. Israel also is working on a container-launchedmissile called the Lora. Rick Fisher, a China military affairs expert, said he is not surprised China is copying the Russian Club container-launched missile. �It fits with China�s penchant for seeking asymmetric advantages against its enemies,� he said. Of course the U.S. military is modernizing as well. In fact, it has been reported that U.S. strategic nuclear forces are no longer using 8-inch floppy disks from the 1970s� In 2014, �60 Minutes� made famous the 8-inch floppy disks used by one antiquated Air Force computer system that, in a crisis, could receive an order from the president tolaunch nuclear missiles from silos across the United States. But no more. At long last, that system, the Strategic Automated Command and Control System or SACCS, has dumped the floppy disk, moving to a �highly secure solid state digitalstorage solution� this past June, said Lt. Col. Jason Rossi, commander of the Air Force�s 595th Strategic Communications Squadron. That is exciting news. What is next? Will they finally get rid of all of their old rotary phones? Meanwhile, President Biden is making it exceedingly clear that the U.S. military will have a culture of �inclusiveness� from this point forward� That�s why we moved so quickly to overturn the discriminary � discriminatory ban on transgender service, and why General Austin�s first memo was a directive to take sexualassault in the military seriously. Every single person, no matter their gender identity, sexual orientation, race, or religious background, deserves to feel safe in the ranks and to have their contributionsvalued. I could go on and on with more examples, but I think that most of you get the point. The U.S. military is being transformed into an institution of social change, and at the same time Russia and China are tightly focused on trying to figure out how to fightand win World War III. When it comes time to fight a real war, do you think that we will actually win? Just because the U.S. military was overwhelmingly dominant at one time, that does not mean that it is still that way today or that it will be that way in the future. One of the only things that is constant about our world is change, and right now the U.S. military is definitely changing in the wrong direction. -------------------------------------------------------------------- TheChess Pieces Are Being Moved Into Place For A Major War In The Middle East ....... Joe Biden has been in the White House for less than two months, and the warmongers that Biden has surrounded himself with have been feverishly setting the stage for the next war in the Middle East. I do not believe that it will start within the next week, but I do believe that it is inevitable. While President Trump was in the White House for four years, the U.S. didn't start any new conflicts, but now the Biden administration is quite determinedto start projecting "American influence" all over the globe once again. Most Americans don't understand the bigger picture, but the truth is that this is going to have very serious implications over the next few years. In this article, I would like to examine some of the chess moves that have been made since Joe Biden entered the White House. As you will see, a very troubling picture emerges once you start putting all of the pieces together. #1 Literally one day after Biden was inaugurated, a massive U.S. military convoy rolled into Syria... A large US military convoy entered northeastern Syria on Thursday, Syrian state news agency SANA reports, citing sources on the ground. According to the report, the convoy included some 40 trucks and armored vehicles and was backed from the air by helicopters. President Trump had tried very hard to disengage from the war in Syria, but Biden has made it crystal clear that the U.S. will be heavily involved in that conflict moving forward. #2 Just a few weeks later, Joe Biden conducted his first airstrike against Iranian-backed forces inside Syria... The US has carried out an air strike targeting Iran-backed militias in Syria, in the first military action undertaken by the Biden administration. The Pentagon said the strike destroyed "multiple facilities" and was ordered in response to attacks against US and coalition personnel in Iraq. Militia officials said one person had been killed but a war monitor reported at least 22 fatalities. #3 Of course it was inevitable that Iranian-backed forces would respond, and they retaliated by launching rockets at a military base in Iraq where U.S. forces are stationed. Just a couple days ago, new Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin said that there willbe a U.S. military response "at a time and place of our own choosing"... Defense Sec. Lloyd Austin tells @MarthaRaddatz the U.S. is still assessing who carried out recent rocket attack on base in Iraq housing U.S. troops--and that if the U.S. decides to respond, it will be "at a time and place of our own choosing." #4 More U.S. airstrikes may come sooner rather than later. In fact, it is being reported that the U.S. has just sent six B-52 bombers to Diego Garcia... The U.S. Air Force is sending six B-52 Stratofortress bombers to Diego Garcia, a military hub that acts as a strategic location for operations in both the Middle East and the Pacific. Citing a U.S. official, CNN on Monday reported that the Cold War-era bomber will be "available for operations against Iran if ordered." #5 The Biden administration is also sending approximately 10,000 more U.S. troops to the Middle East... Once the amphibious assault ship Bataan, which is moving toward the Middle East, arrives, the U.S. will have added roughly 10,000 personnel to the area within the last week, according to The Wall Street Journal. #6 Russia has been busy making moves in the region as well. On Friday, Russia conducted an air strike on an oil-loading facility in Syria that is used by opposition forces that are backed by Turkey, Saudi Arabia and the Biden administration... A suspected missile strike on an oil-loading facility used by Turkey-backed opposition forces in northern Syria sparked a massive blaze across a large area where oil tankers are normally parked, aerial and satellite images show. Syrian opposition groups and at least one war monitor blamed Russia for the strike Friday night near the towns of Jarablus and al-Bab, near the border with Turkey. In a report, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, based in Britain, said Russian warshipsin the Mediterranean had fired three missiles that struck primitive oil refineries and tanker trucks in the region. #7 Meanwhile, Israel continues to hit strategically important targets inside Syria on a regular basis. The following comes from a news report that was published in late February... Syrian air defenses were activated in the capital Damascus and its southern suburbs Sunday night to repel an Israeli missile attack, state media reported. There was no word on casualties. State TV quoted an unnamed military official as saying that most of the Israeli missiles were shot down before reaching their targets near Damascus. #8 Israel is particularly interested in keeping Iran from developing nuclear weapons. In an interview with Fox News, Israeli Defense Minister Benny Gantz just stated that Israel is ready to attack Iran without any U.S. help... The Israeli military is updating plans to strike Iranian nuclear sites and is prepared to act independently, Israeli Defense Minister Benny Gantz told Fox News. Israel has identified numerous targets inside Iran that would hurt its ability to develop a nuclear bomb. "If the world stops them before, it's very much good. But if not, we must stand independently and we must defend ourselves by ourselves," Gantz said in his first sit-down interview with an American outlet. #9 During a phone call last Thursday between Kamala Harris and Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli Prime Minister made it exceedingly clear that his nation is ready to do whatever it takes to prevent the Iranians from developing their own nukes... "The prime minister said we would continue to strengthen our intelligence and security cooperation and said during their conversation that as prime minister of Israel, he is totally committed to preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons that aremeant for our destruction." Of course the Iranians have no plans to back down, and that makes a military conflict between Israel and Iran inevitable. There will be war in the Middle East, and the horror of that conflict will shock the entire planet. And once that war begins, it will greatly accelerate our economic problems and the ongoing political turmoil in this country. So enjoy this brief period of relative stability while you can, because our world is about to start changing in dramatic ways. Originally published at End Of The American Dream - reposted with permission. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Biden�s �weakness� towards Tehran could trigger Israeli airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites - and Third Lebanon War � Joel Rosenberg - https://www.allisrael.com/rosenberg-tells-jerusalem-post-that-biden-weakness-towards-tehran-could-trigger-israeli-airstrikes-on-iranian-nuclear-sites-and-third-lebanon-war The United States has paid little attention to Lebanon in recent years. And that needs to change fast. ALL ISRAEL NEWS Editor-in-Chief Joel Rosenberg warns that if U.S. President Joe Biden renews his country�s participation in the Iranian nuclear deal, thousands of missilescould rain down on Israel from Lebanon. �Biden strikes me as more desperate than Iran to get back into the deal. This has all the makings of emboldening the terror masters in Tehran� I think Tehran is gettingready to attack Israel.� So what does this have to do with Lebanon? In an interview with Jerusalem Post reporter Seth Frantzman, Rosenberg explained that an Iran would use Hezbollah, the Shiite militia entrenched in southern Lebanon, againstIsrael in a proxy war. �What people don�t realize is that Iran�s number one way of striking back at Israel is not primarily with Iranian missiles but with Iranian-built missiles � 150,000 of them � positioned in Lebanon and all aimed at us here in Israel,� Rosenberg said. �That type of scenario � with thousands of missiles raining down on Israel every day � could completely overwhelm Israeli missile defense systems. That is a terrifying prospectand not just for Israel. It could also pull the U.S. into a war inadvertently and the Biden administration must take this seriously.� Rosenberg said that while the Second Lebanon War in 2006 was horrible, he believes that Lebanon will be the site of the "next major war in the Middle East, and possiblyeven in 2021.� �In the 34 days of the Second Lebanon War, we saw 4,000 missiles fired by Hezbollah at Israel � but in a Third Lebanon War, we could see 4,000 missiles a day being firedat Israel. I am very concerned. This is the type of thing that could erupt at a moment�s notice.� The Biden administration is �beginning to take a series of actions that look very weak toward Iran. There is a growing sense among senior Israeli officials that they mayhave to go back to the way they were thinking in 2012 � that if the U.S. and international community don�t take decisive action either diplomatically or militarily to stop Iran from getting �the bomb,� then the IDF may be forced to launch pre-emptive airstrikesagainst nuclear facilities inside Iran.� Israel, which frequently launches airstrikes against Iranian targets in the region, has issued warnings about Iranian nuclear enrichment and has expressed concern aboutTehran�s role in Yemen, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon. While former President Donald Trump gave Israel the freedom to strike back, Iran now seems to be taking advantage of what it perceives as a weak American policy. Iran hasattacked U.S. targets in Iraq, is hammering Saudi Arabia with missiles and drones and even attacked an Israeli-owned ship in the Gulf of Oman. �If the White House and State Department make Israel feel vulnerable, and don�t find a way to force Iran to back down on its nuclear program � if Biden cannot or will notfind a way to neutralize the Iranian threat � then Israel won�t sit around and do nothing,� Rosenberg said. �Israeli leaders may feel they have no other choice but to strike Iran, and the implications for every country in the region � and for the U.S. � arehuge.� These threats to regional stability are some of the consequences of Middle East peace. "Making peace is the right thing to do, but never think for one moment that you�re operating in a static environment,� he said. �There are forces that are hell-bent on makingsure that Arabs and Israelis never make lasting peace and they will do everything in their power to create war and terror to prevent peace from taking hold.� On the other hand, Iran's recent bold actions could be driving the Saudis to make a peace deal with Israel. Rosenberg, who was hosted by Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman in Saudi Arabia, said he believes it may happen sooner than we think. �But I also want to show people that such a peace treaty is going to be far more explosive and controversial to the extremists in the region, from Iran to Hamas, Hezbollahand Houthis,� he said. �Why? Because the Saudis are the custodians of the Two Holy Mosques. For them to make peace with Israel could very well set off the mullahs in Tehran and all their allies. So that is something that we have to sort of understand and factorin.� The U.S. implication of Saudi Arabia in the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi may also force Riyadh toward a peace deal with Israel. �Because of the Iran threat and possibility of the U.S. abandoning the Saudis, the Saudis may decide that they need a strategic alliance with Israel sooner rather than later,� Rosenberg explained. �My recommendation is if they truly believe they should make peace with Israel for their own national interests, then they should do it as soon as possible. A Saudi-Israelipeace deal will dramatically change Americans� view of Saudi Arabia for the better. It is the one move that the Saudis can make that will break through to the American people and show Americans and the world that the Saudis truly are trustworthy and long-termpartners for peace.� Rosenberg said the region is changing fast. �It used to be that if Israel got itself in a war in Lebanon or with any Arab group or state, this would drive back any Arab desire to make peace with us. But I no longerthink this is the case," he concluded. "The Saudis are now experiencing what Israel has experienced for years, where Iran and its proxies fire rockets and the world hates you for defending yourself.� VISIT: PROPHECY WATCHER WEEKLY NEWS: HTTP://PROPHECY-WATCHER-WEEKLY-NEWS.BLOGSPOT.COM

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

DEBATE VIDEOS and more......