Criminality, Totalitarianism Of U.S. Government Evident In IRS Scandal
The total disregard for the rule of law being revealed by testimony in the ongoing Congressional investigation into the Internal Revenue Service targeting scandal proves the criminality and totalitarianism of the U.S. government and its disregard for the people.
It is clear that the IRS targeted conservative groups - particularly those with the words "Tea Party" or "Patriot" in their names - for special scrutiny in order to silence and intimidate them and to influence the 2012 election. And it's equally clear that there is now a criminal conspiracy to obstruct justice that extends at least into the upper reaches of the agency, if not into the Barack Obama Administration itself.
The notion that emails sought by the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee were simply "lost" and are not "recoverable" defies belief. Try using that excuse yourself when faced with an audit - a process in which the "taxpayer" is guilty until he proves himself innocent - by this rogue agency and see how that flies.
Federal law under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires companies to maintain all documents including electronic documents that form the basis of an audit or review for seven years. Failure to do so can result in a fine of up to $100,000 and/or a prison sentence of up to 20 years for anyone who destroys, alters, mutilates or conceals any electronic document in an official investigation.
Federal law requires the IRS to keep records of all agency emails and to print out hard copies and retain them in the event of a computer glitch. Federal law also requires the IRS to report the loss of records belonging to top IRS officials to the National Archives and Records Administration as soon as a problem is recognized. According to testimony in the Congressional hearing, the IRS did neither.
Testimony and media reports seem to confirm that the IRS "lost" the emails around the time questions began being raised about possible IRS targeting and that the IRS canceled a contract with a data storage company right before the emails were "lost."
A special prosecutor with full investigative and subpoena powers should be appointed to get to the bottom of this scandal. I'm not confident that a Congressional committee will hold accountable all those responsible. Congressional committees have a history of releasing findings based on politics rather than the law or the facts. And Democrats and a sycophantic corporate media have done all they can to create the appearance that this investigation is nothing more than a partisan witch hunt by the Republicans and that Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) is nothing more than a partisan hack.
While it's business as usual for the criminal class of Washington politicians to obfuscate, denigrate and provide cover for the criminality they inspired in the government agencies they control, it's astonishing to me that rank-and-file Democrats do not see the dangerous precedent in one party - even if it's "their" party - using a government agency to target its opponents. Just the hint that Republicans might pull a similar stunt when they control government should be impetus enough for Democrats to want to be sure everyone involved is held accountable and punished to such a degree that it will be many years before similar criminality is again considered.
The Federal government is nothing less than a criminal enterprise being run as a totalitarian Third World banana republic. And an emasculated Congress more interested in the politics of the thing than it is in the Constitution is apparently too feckless to do much if anything to stop it.
The White House's prophetic Caliphate - Bill Wilson - www.dailyjot.com
In promoting all things Muslim--by supporting revolution and instability in the Middle East, by adopting the Muslim Brotherhood (and by association the Taliban, al Qaeda, Hamas and other offshoot military/terrorist arms) as a foreign policy partner, by releasing from prison the leader of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria--now just called the Islamic State, and by training ISIS military in Jordan, the occupant of the Oval Office will likely go down in history as the American leader who played a pivotal role in the rise of militant Islam worldwide. The world is watching a major event in history unfolding before its very eyes, and it may well be prophetic.
The Ottoman Empire was the last empire to rule over the Middle East. It was a Sunni-dominated Islamic Caliphate that ruled 624 years from 1299 to 1923, peaking at 35 million people in 1856 with Constantinople as its capitol. This vast empire extended from Iraq to Algeria from Hungary to Somalia, covering the Middle East, Northern Africa, Eastern Europe and Turkey. After World War I and weakened by various rebellions, the empire was replaced by the Republic of Turkey on October 29, 1923 and the caliphate was abolished on March 3, 1924. Many Bible scholars believe the Ottoman Empire more aptly fits the description in Revelation 17 and Daniel 2 and 7 than does the Roman Empire as the one that will revive and rise as the beast empire. It is a subject of fierce debate.
Notwithstanding, there are numerous verses which in context allude to the antichrist being Assyrian--Isaiah 10:5, 10:24, 14:25, 19:23, 30:31, 31:8, Micah 5:5-6, and Hosea 11:5. Ezekiel 38:17 refers to him as "he of whom I have spoken in old time by my servants the prophets of Israel." It is quite possible that the antichrist/the Assyrian will arise from what is now Turkey. Jesus Christ identifies modern Turkey as the seat of Satan. In Revelation 2:12-13, Jesus says, "And to the angel of the church in Pergamos write: These things says he which has the sharp sword with two edges; I know thy works, and where you dwell, even where Satan's seat is..."
In addition, no other religion on earth persecutes the saints as does Islam. Not the Roman Catholics, not the Hindus, not the Buddhists. The Roman Catholics, for all their political shenanigans and idolatry, still hold to a doctrine that Christ was crucified, rose from the dead, and was propitiation for our sin. Islam does not. Islam believes that Jesus was a great prophet, but was not the son of God. 2 John 7 says, "For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist." Traditional Islamic enemies of Israel, Russia, the Roman Catholic church all may well play a role in the end time return of Christ. This White House, however, has played a pivotal role as a catalyst of prophetic end time events.
It is clear that the IRS targeted conservative groups - particularly those with the words "Tea Party" or "Patriot" in their names - for special scrutiny in order to silence and intimidate them and to influence the 2012 election. And it's equally clear that there is now a criminal conspiracy to obstruct justice that extends at least into the upper reaches of the agency, if not into the Barack Obama Administration itself.
The notion that emails sought by the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee were simply "lost" and are not "recoverable" defies belief. Try using that excuse yourself when faced with an audit - a process in which the "taxpayer" is guilty until he proves himself innocent - by this rogue agency and see how that flies.
Federal law under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires companies to maintain all documents including electronic documents that form the basis of an audit or review for seven years. Failure to do so can result in a fine of up to $100,000 and/or a prison sentence of up to 20 years for anyone who destroys, alters, mutilates or conceals any electronic document in an official investigation.
Federal law requires the IRS to keep records of all agency emails and to print out hard copies and retain them in the event of a computer glitch. Federal law also requires the IRS to report the loss of records belonging to top IRS officials to the National Archives and Records Administration as soon as a problem is recognized. According to testimony in the Congressional hearing, the IRS did neither.
Testimony and media reports seem to confirm that the IRS "lost" the emails around the time questions began being raised about possible IRS targeting and that the IRS canceled a contract with a data storage company right before the emails were "lost."
A special prosecutor with full investigative and subpoena powers should be appointed to get to the bottom of this scandal. I'm not confident that a Congressional committee will hold accountable all those responsible. Congressional committees have a history of releasing findings based on politics rather than the law or the facts. And Democrats and a sycophantic corporate media have done all they can to create the appearance that this investigation is nothing more than a partisan witch hunt by the Republicans and that Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) is nothing more than a partisan hack.
While it's business as usual for the criminal class of Washington politicians to obfuscate, denigrate and provide cover for the criminality they inspired in the government agencies they control, it's astonishing to me that rank-and-file Democrats do not see the dangerous precedent in one party - even if it's "their" party - using a government agency to target its opponents. Just the hint that Republicans might pull a similar stunt when they control government should be impetus enough for Democrats to want to be sure everyone involved is held accountable and punished to such a degree that it will be many years before similar criminality is again considered.
The Federal government is nothing less than a criminal enterprise being run as a totalitarian Third World banana republic. And an emasculated Congress more interested in the politics of the thing than it is in the Constitution is apparently too feckless to do much if anything to stop it.
The White House's prophetic Caliphate - Bill Wilson - www.dailyjot.com
In promoting all things Muslim--by supporting revolution and instability in the Middle East, by adopting the Muslim Brotherhood (and by association the Taliban, al Qaeda, Hamas and other offshoot military/terrorist arms) as a foreign policy partner, by releasing from prison the leader of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria--now just called the Islamic State, and by training ISIS military in Jordan, the occupant of the Oval Office will likely go down in history as the American leader who played a pivotal role in the rise of militant Islam worldwide. The world is watching a major event in history unfolding before its very eyes, and it may well be prophetic.
The Ottoman Empire was the last empire to rule over the Middle East. It was a Sunni-dominated Islamic Caliphate that ruled 624 years from 1299 to 1923, peaking at 35 million people in 1856 with Constantinople as its capitol. This vast empire extended from Iraq to Algeria from Hungary to Somalia, covering the Middle East, Northern Africa, Eastern Europe and Turkey. After World War I and weakened by various rebellions, the empire was replaced by the Republic of Turkey on October 29, 1923 and the caliphate was abolished on March 3, 1924. Many Bible scholars believe the Ottoman Empire more aptly fits the description in Revelation 17 and Daniel 2 and 7 than does the Roman Empire as the one that will revive and rise as the beast empire. It is a subject of fierce debate.
Notwithstanding, there are numerous verses which in context allude to the antichrist being Assyrian--Isaiah 10:5, 10:24, 14:25, 19:23, 30:31, 31:8, Micah 5:5-6, and Hosea 11:5. Ezekiel 38:17 refers to him as "he of whom I have spoken in old time by my servants the prophets of Israel." It is quite possible that the antichrist/the Assyrian will arise from what is now Turkey. Jesus Christ identifies modern Turkey as the seat of Satan. In Revelation 2:12-13, Jesus says, "And to the angel of the church in Pergamos write: These things says he which has the sharp sword with two edges; I know thy works, and where you dwell, even where Satan's seat is..."
In addition, no other religion on earth persecutes the saints as does Islam. Not the Roman Catholics, not the Hindus, not the Buddhists. The Roman Catholics, for all their political shenanigans and idolatry, still hold to a doctrine that Christ was crucified, rose from the dead, and was propitiation for our sin. Islam does not. Islam believes that Jesus was a great prophet, but was not the son of God. 2 John 7 says, "For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist." Traditional Islamic enemies of Israel, Russia, the Roman Catholic church all may well play a role in the end time return of Christ. This White House, however, has played a pivotal role as a catalyst of prophetic end time events.
BE SUSupreme Court, Congress, and tyranny - Bill Wilson - www.dailyjot.com
The Washington Times has written an analysis of the Supreme Court decisions impacting the occupant of the Oval Office. The nine justices, two of whom were appointed by the "president," have rejected his expansion of powers in 9-0 decisions 20 times in five years. While the June 30 decisions on socialized medicine and compulsory union dues were not unanimous, they were an indication of how conservatives and liberals have differing views on what the same words mean, and that the term "liberal" is becoming exponentially redefined as "tyrannical" in the interpretation of law. The divide on use of executive power and government intrusion in personal and religious life in America is widening.
Congress should not need an unelected Supreme Court to rule that dictatorial executive authority and overreaching government is unconstitutional. Moreover, American citizens do not need an unelected court to tell them when their rights are violated by executive fiat. There are some things that are obvious. The problem here is that the Supreme Court and the courts under them do not recognize that all law is originated and given by God. He is the source of the law. Law cannot be just with man rejecting God and building precept upon precept from man's interpretation of what is just. Ecclesiastes 7:20 says, "For there is not a just man upon earth, that does good, and sins not."
Notwithstanding, Ohio Republican and Speaker of the House John Boehner said, "Today's decision is a victory for religious freedom and another defeat for an administration that has repeatedly crossed constitutional lines in pursuit of its big government objectives." All well and good except that Boehner and his colleagues have Constitutional responsibility to challenge a president over abuse of executive authority. Article 1 Section 2 of the US Constitution gives the House the sole "Power of Impeachment" and Article 3 gives the Senate the sole "Power to try all Impeachments." Article 2 Section 3 requires the President to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed."
This "president" has publicly said that he will not enforce certain laws that he does not agree with, including Defense of Marriage, immigration laws and border security, privacy laws, laws against negotiating with and funding terrorists, and those that pertain to religious freedom and freedom of speech. While the Supreme Court has done well to heal the hurt of the citizens slightly, Boehner and his colleagues have done little but grandstand in abdicating their Constitutional responsibilities to a lawless president. They are an Isaiah 59:13 group: "In transgressing and lying against the Lord, and departing away from our God, speaking oppression and revolt, conceiving and uttering from the heart words of falsehood."
RE TO CHECK OUT MY PROPHECY WEBSITES...............................
The Washington Times has written an analysis of the Supreme Court decisions impacting the occupant of the Oval Office. The nine justices, two of whom were appointed by the "president," have rejected his expansion of powers in 9-0 decisions 20 times in five years. While the June 30 decisions on socialized medicine and compulsory union dues were not unanimous, they were an indication of how conservatives and liberals have differing views on what the same words mean, and that the term "liberal" is becoming exponentially redefined as "tyrannical" in the interpretation of law. The divide on use of executive power and government intrusion in personal and religious life in America is widening.
Congress should not need an unelected Supreme Court to rule that dictatorial executive authority and overreaching government is unconstitutional. Moreover, American citizens do not need an unelected court to tell them when their rights are violated by executive fiat. There are some things that are obvious. The problem here is that the Supreme Court and the courts under them do not recognize that all law is originated and given by God. He is the source of the law. Law cannot be just with man rejecting God and building precept upon precept from man's interpretation of what is just. Ecclesiastes 7:20 says, "For there is not a just man upon earth, that does good, and sins not."
Notwithstanding, Ohio Republican and Speaker of the House John Boehner said, "Today's decision is a victory for religious freedom and another defeat for an administration that has repeatedly crossed constitutional lines in pursuit of its big government objectives." All well and good except that Boehner and his colleagues have Constitutional responsibility to challenge a president over abuse of executive authority. Article 1 Section 2 of the US Constitution gives the House the sole "Power of Impeachment" and Article 3 gives the Senate the sole "Power to try all Impeachments." Article 2 Section 3 requires the President to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed."
This "president" has publicly said that he will not enforce certain laws that he does not agree with, including Defense of Marriage, immigration laws and border security, privacy laws, laws against negotiating with and funding terrorists, and those that pertain to religious freedom and freedom of speech. While the Supreme Court has done well to heal the hurt of the citizens slightly, Boehner and his colleagues have done little but grandstand in abdicating their Constitutional responsibilities to a lawless president. They are an Isaiah 59:13 group: "In transgressing and lying against the Lord, and departing away from our God, speaking oppression and revolt, conceiving and uttering from the heart words of falsehood."
RE TO CHECK OUT MY PROPHECY WEBSITES...............................
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.